MyTrueAncestry Mytrueancestry.com

MTA - New Feature - My Archaeogenetic Map of Iberia.

dXBQRYX.png

xQPQ1Xf.png

HLjLNo6.png

ghys9Tq.png

umzHiEx.png

0M2ABEl.png
 
Updated

Code:
Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...
(Smaller numbers mean closer matches to you)

1. Bell Beaker Germany (2500 BC) ..... 4.019 - I0112
Top 99% match vs all users

2. Alemannic Bavaria (500 AD) ..... 4.987 - ALH_1
Top 99% match vs all users

3. Late Medieval Gotlander (1600 AD) ..... 5.659 - Unknown
Top 97% match vs all users

4. Nordic Lombard / Winnili (590 AD) ..... 6.668 - SZ16
Top 97% match vs all users

5. Viking Sweden (1100 AD) ..... 6.934 - Sigtuna stg021
Top 97% match vs all users

6. Viking Sweden (1100 AD) ..... 7.141 - stg021
Top 97% match vs all users

7. Bell Beaker Amesbury (2150 BC) ..... 7.274 - I5512
Top 97% match vs all users

8. Anglo Saxon (780 AD) ..... 7.396 - Hinxton HS3
Top 95% match vs all users

9. Greuthungi / Ostrogoth (400 AD) ..... 7.457 - MJ19
Top 99% match vs all users

10. Viking Sweden (1100 AD) ..... 7.761 - Sigtuna grt036
Top 99% match vs all users

11. Alemannic Saxon Bavaria (500 AD) ..... 7.793 - AED_249
Top 97% match vs all users

12. Colonial American Pennsylvania (1700 AD) ..... 7.916 - Shohola
Top 88% match vs all users

13. Saxon Hinxton (720 AD) ..... 8.203 - HinxtonO1
Top 70% match vs all users

14. Bronze Age Orkney Islands (1750 BC) ..... 8.514 - I2981
Top 78% match vs all users

15. Bell Beaker Scotland (2145 BC) ..... 8.688 - I5471
Top 80% match vs all users

16. Young Longobard Noble (605 AD) ..... 8.722 - NS6
Top 76% match vs all users

17. Bell Beaker England (2100 BC) ..... 8.783 - I2452
Top 79% match vs all users

18. Alemannic Bavaria (425 AD) ..... 9.003 - STR_316
Top 91% match vs all users

19. Bell Beaker England (2150 BC) ..... 9.096 - I5382
Top 95% match vs all users

20. Icelander Late Medieval (1650 AD) ..... 9.406 - KOV-A2
Top 76% match vs all users

21. Anglo Saxon Oakington (470 AD) ..... 9.408 - OakO4
Top 82% match vs all users

22. Scotland Late Bronze Age (900 BC) ..... 9.44 - I2860
Top 70% match vs all users

23. Viking Saxon Iceland (1150 AD) ..... 9.484 - TSK-A26
Top 78% match vs all users

24. Germanic Lombard (590 AD) ..... 9.499 - SZ42
Top 87% match vs all users

25. Early Bronze Age Thames (1800 BC) ..... 9.519 - I5377
Top 68% match vs all users

26. Germano-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) ..... 9.534 - 3DRIF-16
Top 77% match vs all users

27. Scythian Ukraine (600 BC) ..... 9.546 - scy006
Top 95% match vs all users

28. Bronze Age Scottish Islands (2350 BC) ..... 9.599 - I5367
Top 89% match vs all users

29. Viking Gaelic Mix Iceland (935 AD) ..... 9.676 - VDP-A7
Top 94% match vs all users

30. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) ..... 9.753 - SZ15
Top 68% match vs all users

31. Alemannic Bavaria (450 AD) ..... 9.756 - BIM_33
Top 84% match vs all users

32. Bell Beaker Oxford (2150 BC) ..... 9.924 - I2447
Top 90% match vs all users

33. Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) ..... 9.929 - 6DRIF-21
Top 79% match vs all users

34. Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) ..... 9.974 - SZ23
Top 63% match vs all users

35. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) ..... 10.01 - SZ2
Top 97% match vs all users

36. Bell Beaker Germany (2250 BC) ..... 10.13 - I0806
Top 92% match vs all users

37. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) ..... 10.17 - SZ7
Top 84% match vs all users

38. Bell Beaker England (2000 BC) ..... 10.17 - I6679
Top 95% match vs all users

39. Bell Beaker Scotland (2100 BC) ..... 10.21 - I2568
Top 70% match vs all users

40. Middle Bronze Age England (1575 BC) ..... 10.36 - I7573
Top 82% match vs all users

41. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) ..... 10.41 - SZ12
Top 71% match vs all users

42. Viking Gaelic Mix Iceland (1000 AD) ..... 10.42 - VDP-A6
Top 70% match vs all users

43. Halstatt (775 BC) ..... 10.48 - DA112
Top 97% match vs all users

44. Bell Beaker England (2150 BC) ..... 10.51 - I1767
Top 60% match vs all users

45. Germanic Lombard (590 AD) ..... 10.52 - SZ11
Top 82% match vs all users

46. Scotland Late Bronze Age (900 BC) ..... 10.53 - I2859
Top 69% match vs all users

47. Bronze Age Celt England (1000 BC) ..... 10.59 - I5383
Top 66% match vs all users

48. Bronze Age Germany (1050 BC) ..... 10.63 - I0099
Top 88% match vs all users

49. Alemannic Bavaria (500 AD) ..... 10.69 - AED_106
Top 96% match vs all users

50. Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) ..... 10.87 - SZ38
Top 59% match vs all users

51. Saxon Settler Viking Iceland (935 AD) ..... 11.09 - GRS-A1
Top 76% match vs all users

52. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) ..... 11.12 - SZ14
Top 69% match vs all users

53. Frankish Longobard Noble (605 AD) ..... 11.14 - NS12c
Top 96% match vs all users

54. Gaelic Settler Viking Iceland (935 AD) ..... 11.15 - SSG-A2
Top 64% match vs all users

55. Celtic Briton (0 AD) ..... 11.15 - Hinxton 4
Top 67% match vs all users

56. Estonia Iron Age (0 AD) ..... 11.18 - Rise00
Top 98% match vs all users

57. Visigoth Germanic Girona (550 AD) ..... 11.2 - I12162
Top 59% match vs all users

58. Bell Beaker Salisbury (2200 BC) ..... 11.22 - I6777
Top 96% match vs all users

59. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) ..... 11.24 - SZ22
Top 83% match vs all users

60. Corded Ware Denmark (2450 BC) ..... 11.28 - Rise61
Top 81% match vs all users

61. Beaeker-Scythian Ukraine (580 BC) ..... 11.33 - MJ13
Top 96% match vs all users

62. Viking Sweden (935 AD) ..... 11.34 - gtm021
Top 95% match vs all users

63. Alemannic Bavaria (500 AD) ..... 11.4 - ALH_10
Top 80% match vs all users

64. Bell Beaker Amesbury (2250 BC) ..... 11.41 - I2566
Top 82% match vs all users

65. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) ..... 11.42 - SZ4
Top 80% match vs all users

66. Bell Beaker Amesbury (2150 BC) ..... 11.42 - I5513
Top 91% match vs all users

67. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) ..... 11.43 - SZ9
Top 78% match vs all users

68. Saxon Germanic Empuries (275 BC) ..... 11.47 - I8206
Top 79% match vs all users

69. Western Pomerania Unetice (2000 BC) ..... 11.47 - Rise139
Top 95% match vs all users

70. Western Pomerania Unetice (1860 BC) ..... 11.47 - Rise109
Top 95% match vs all users

71. Unetice Bohemia (1800 BC) ..... 11.54 - Rise150
Top 86% match vs all users

72. Gallic Gladiator York (250 AD) ..... 11.63 - 6DRIF-22
Top 74% match vs all users

73. Ostrogoth Nordic (520 AD) ..... 11.68 - STR_220
Top 84% match vs all users

74. Viking Sweden (1100 AD) ..... 11.73 - 97029
Top 79% match vs all users

75. Bell Beaker Southern France (2050 BC) ..... 11.74 - I3875
Top 63% match vs all users

76. Gaelic Settler Viking Iceland (935 AD) ..... 11.8 - ORE-A1
Top 65% match vs all users

77. Ireland Copper Age (1950 BC) ..... 11.83 - Rathlin1
Top 86% match vs all users

78. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) ..... 11.87 - SZ24
Top 83% match vs all users

79. Alemanni Longobard Noble (605 AD) ..... 11.94 - NS1
Top 68% match vs all users

80. Bell Beaker Poland (2500 BC) ..... 11.97 - I4251
Top 84% match vs all users

81. Nordic Lombard (670 AD) ..... 12.07 - CL84
Top 76% match vs all users

82. Eurasian Steppes Sintashta (1860 BC) ..... 12.07 - Rise395
Top 97% match vs all users

83. Food Vessel Scotland (1900 BC) ..... 12.08 - I5515
Top 70% match vs all users

84. St Marys Coffin Maryland (1683 AD) ..... 12.16 - I2097
Top 64% match vs all users

85. Bell Beaker Oxford (2150 BC) ..... 12.18 - I2443
Top 93% match vs all users

86. Viking Norse Iceland (935 AD) ..... 12.22 - KNS-A1
Top 74% match vs all users

87. Czech Velke Prilepy (2050 BC) ..... 12.24 - Rise577
Top 60% match vs all users

88. Bronze Age Scotland (1450 BC) ..... 12.28 - I2653
Top 64% match vs all users

89. Viking Sweden (1100 AD) ..... 12.31 - Sigtuna 84001
Top 90% match vs all users

90. Viking Sweden (1100 AD) ..... 12.35 - stg020
Top 96% match vs all users

91. Viking Norse Iceland (935 AD) ..... 12.35 - DAV-A9
Top 96% match vs all users

92. Viking Norse Iceland (935 AD) ..... 12.36 - VDP-A5
Top 89% match vs all users

93. Bell Beaker England (2165 BC) ..... 12.37 - I2453
Top 82% match vs all users

94. Pre-Viking Sweden (500 AD) ..... 12.4 - Rise174 Oxie7
Top 94% match vs all users

95. Bell Beaker Cambridge (2075 BC) ..... 12.5 - I3255
Top 65% match vs all users

96. Viking High-Ranking Shieldmaiden (950 AD) ..... 12.53 - brk581
Top 94% match vs all users

97. Viking Sweden (1100 AD) ..... 12.67 - Sigtuna 84005
Top 99% match vs all users

98. Viking Sweden (1100 AD) ..... 12.77 - Sigtuna urm160
Top 98% match vs all users

99. Germano-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) ..... 12.78 - 6DRIF-3
Top 62% match vs all users

100. Bronze Age Scotland (1450 BC) ..... 12.8 - I2573
Top 65% match vs all users

3VjecwM.jpg



5 new Deep Dive matches, 25 in total

k5bjTuD.png
 
I'm beginning to think that so many of these new exotic obscure populations contain ancient overlapping components with the mainstream.

imho The algorithm needs to be calibrated.
It sees a Root Component and start assigning samples with that root component at random.

I doubt it ...

Hopefully they'll figure out how to fix it by the next update :)
 
nOrljOv.jpg


Ancient Ancestry (Premium Map):
YbOTEMA.jpg



Deep Dive Map:
OY89flc.jpg



Ancestral Timelapse GIF:
JvDij9K.gif
 
A mysterious Indo-Greek has also appeared here :)


71329864_2371511986447932_949067779619684352_n.jpg


70028896_2448635608715544_7143763178667638784_n.jpg

Re-uploaded my DNAkit Studio Superkit. Deep dive results are a notable change with the update. Also, I get the Indo-Greek on my map as well now.

9GjjJZ4.png

EPh2uNh.png

ppDjX5b.png

JjHIFW9.png

COi9oRb.png

I'm beginning to think that so many of these new exotic obscure populations contain ancient overlapping components with the mainstream.

imho The algorithm needs to be calibrated.
It sees a Root Component and start assigning samples with that root component at random.

I doubt it ...

Hopefully they'll figure out how to fix it by the next update :)

Guys, I think that these new "exotic obscure populations" are related to this:

Fd5l4TH.jpg


Hugs to all, dear friends (y):)
 
Guys, I think that these new "exotic obscure populations" are related to this:

Fd5l4TH.jpg


Hugs to all, dear friends (y):)

Thanks, Duarte. Now everything is clear.


I just discussed it in private yesterday with Pax and other friends.


I went to check on the paper and its supplements: he should date back to 167-46 BC, male, paternal haplogroup J1 and maternal M30b. We have investigated his autosomal analysis and in some ways he seems to be very "autochthonous" (an Iranic / Central Asian guy with some southern influence from India, we are probably talking about a Saka / eastern Scythian, more or less hellenized), however in lack of other more precise elements they rightly give a more generic indication, classifying him among the Indo-Greeks.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/suppl/2018/03/31/292581.DC1/292581-1.pdf

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/suppl/2018/03/31/292581.DC1/292581-2.xlsx


Since it appears among the matches of several Italians, both northern and southern, and given the considerable geographical distance that separates us, it would perhaps be more correct to assume that this genetic contact is to be attributed to a more archaic predecessor, common to both Indo-Europeans projected to Asia, and to those who poured into Europe :)
 
Don't you think this is pure cheating? How many cM can be inherited after 2000 years from just one or a few individuals who lived in those times ?! Virtually zero, or just be an extremely rare coincidence of identical 0.N cM recombination, but not an inheritance from those times. This is what I think.

Remembering Tomenable contribution to this thread:

It depends, Clovis Anzick-1 has very long (many cM) matches to modern Native Americans, even though he lived thousands of years ago. It has been discussed a few years ago in this thread (and such long matches with Anzick-1 were on GEDmatch, so the same methodology as with matches between modern people):

https://forums.familytreedna.com/fo...n-ancient-dna-have-matches-with-living-people

Quote: "you might be surprised to hear this 11,000 year old infant has some 3rd cousins living today"
 
Also, here's a useful tip for people of Germano-Celtic ancestry who don't get any Celtic tribes in their analysis. (I get Franks, Visigoths, and Saxons as my tribes, and per the useful Ancestry hack-which they've gotten rid of, sadly-I am 65% Germanic and 32% Celtic) Very few ancient Celtic tribes have Germanic admixture, while quite a few Germanic tribes, who were in the vanguard of the expansion into Celtic lands, have Celtic admixture. So this is why my first tribe is the Franks, an outer Germanic tribe in the west of their lands with decent Celtic admixture. My shared DNA sample is Bronze Age Scotland, either a cousin or an ancestor of my great-great-grandmother, a descendant of the Forbushes of Edinburgh.
 
Thanks, Duarte. Now everything is clear.


I just discussed it in private yesterday with Pax and other friends.


I went to check on the paper and its supplements: he should date back to 167-46 BC, male, paternal haplogroup J1 and maternal M30b. We have investigated his autosomal analysis and in some ways he seems to be very "autochthonous" (an Iranic / Central Asian guy with some southern influence from India, we are probably talking about a Saka / eastern Scythian, more or less hellenized), however in lack of other more precise elements they rightly give a more generic indication, classifying him among the Indo-Greeks.

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/suppl/2018/03/31/292581.DC1/292581-1.pdf

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/suppl/2018/03/31/292581.DC1/292581-2.xlsx


Since it appears among the matches of several Italians, both northern and southern, and given the considerable geographical distance that separates us, it would perhaps be more correct to assume that this genetic contact is to be attributed to a more archaic predecessor, common to both Indo-Europeans projected to Asia, and to those who poured into Europe :)

There is something wrong with this Butkara_IA sample. Suddenly it appears as the closest ancient sample to most Bulgarians and Macedonians. He is even not a "pure" Ancient Greek or Thracian, who may have followed Alexander, but a mixture of Steppe and Indian. How about other Balkan people?

Here are my results:
Greco-Bactrian + Roman (10.86)
Greco-Bactrian + Gaul (11.02)
Greco-Bactrian (11.32)
Roman (16.03)
Gaul (18.04)

[h=3]Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...[/h][h=6](Smaller numbers mean closer matches to you)[/h]1. Indo-Greek Kingdom Iron Age Butkara (10 AD) ..... 11.32 (Click for more info)
Top
[FONT=&quot]​
98
% match vs all users[/FONT]

2. Visigoth Mixed Slav Girona (550 AD) ..... 12.59 (Click for more info)
Top
[FONT=&quot]​
92
% match vs all users[/FONT]

3. Byzantine Roman Warrior (605 AD) ..... 13.49 (Click for more info)
Top
[FONT=&quot]​
97
% match vs all users[/FONT]

4. Central Roman (590 AD) ..... 16.03 (Click for more info)
Top
[FONT=&quot]​
92
% match vs all users[/FONT]

5. Central Roman (590 AD) ..... 16.46 (Click for more info)
Top
[FONT=&quot]​
88
% match vs all users[/FONT]
 
There is something wrong with this Butkara_IA sample. Suddenly it appears as the closest ancient sample to most Bulgarians and Macedonians. He is even not a "pure" Ancient Greek or Thracian, who may have followed Alexander, but a mixture of Steppe and Indian. How about other Balkan people?

Here are my results:
Greco-Bactrian + Roman (10.86)
Greco-Bactrian + Gaul (11.02)
Greco-Bactrian (11.32)
Roman (16.03)
Gaul (18.04)

Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...

(Smaller numbers mean closer matches to you)

1. Indo-Greek Kingdom Iron Age Butkara (10 AD) ..... 11.32 (Click for more info)
Top
98
% match vs all users

2. Visigoth Mixed Slav Girona (550 AD) ..... 12.59 (Click for more info)
Top
92
% match vs all users

3. Byzantine Roman Warrior (605 AD) ..... 13.49 (Click for more info)
Top
97
% match vs all users

4. Central Roman (590 AD) ..... 16.03 (Click for more info)
Top
92
% match vs all users

5. Central Roman (590 AD) ..... 16.46 (Click for more info)
Top
88
% match vs all users

@eastara,

sometimes the oracle and the combinations proposed by MTA don't offer the maximum precision, especially for some regions.
I hypothesize that this sudden proximity or similarity of the Indo-Greek sample to the southern Slavic peoples may depend on the fact that this calculator "reads" in a similar way on the one hand the combination of northeastern European components with the Anatolian / Caucasian ones of the Balkans, and on the other the combination of steppe with the southernmost Iran / India. I believe that with the next MTA updates they take better measurements
 


My shared cm seems way to high with alot of these samples:

hk2.png



M1.png



M2.png



M3.png
I don't know what to answer, @Dibran. Indeed, these values ​​also seem to me to be high. It also happens with my matches. Assuming that these genetic links are real, the only thing that comes to my mind is that MTA intercepts very old DNA segments, common in this case to all/manyEuropeans, fragments incidentally also inherited by these ancient samples

Sent from my SM-J730F using Eupedia Forum mobile app
 
Mine

Seleucid + Gaul (7.388)

Greco- Bactrian + Gaul (8.514) Greco-Bactrian
(11.39)
Gaul (15.04)
Seleucid (15.71) Най
-близките ви археогенетични съвпадения ...


(По-малките числа означават по-близки съвпадения с вас)


1. Visigoth Смесен славянин Girona (550 AD) ..... 11.02 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
95
% мач срещу всички потребители


2. Индо-гръцко кралство Желязна епоха Butkara (10 AD) ..... 11.39 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
1
% мач срещу всички потребители


3. Византийски римски воин (605 г. сл. н. е.) ..... 13.87 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
96
% мач срещу всички потребители


4. Cisalpine Gaul (590 AD) ..... 15.04 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
78
% мач срещу всички потребители


5. Hellenic Seleucid Anatolia (165 BC) ..... 15.71 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
98
% мач срещу всички потребители


6. Средновековен тиролски (590 сл. н. е.) ..... 15.91 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
69
% мач срещу всички потребители


7. Скитска Молдова (300 пр.н.е.) ..... 16.44 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
78
% мач срещу всички потребители


8. Central Roman (590 AD) ..... 16.58 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
90
% мач срещу всички потребители


9. Central Roman (590 AD) ..... 17.42 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
86
% мач срещу всички потребители


10. Средновековен тиролски (670 г. сл. н. е.) ..... 17.49 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
50
% мач срещу всички потребители


11. Central Roman (590 AD) ..... 18.03 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
87
% мач срещу всички потребители


12. Западно-скитско Черно море (290 г. пр.н.е.) ..... 18.23 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
68
% мач срещу всички потребители


13. Central Roman (670 AD) ..... 18.49 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
85
% мач срещу всички потребители


14. Племето Тюрингии (420 AD) ..... 18.58 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
46
% мач срещу всички потребители


15. Скитска Украйна (600 г. пр.н.е.) ..... 19.57 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
76
% мач срещу всички потребители


16. Средновековен Франк (670 г. сл. н. е.) ..... 19.6 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
36
% мач срещу всички потребители


17. Средновековна Унгария / Балкан (1244 сл. н. е.) ..... 19.85 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
42
% мач срещу всички потребители


18. Франк-Галия / Ломбардия Италия (670 сл. н. е.) ..... 20.1 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
35
% мач срещу всички потребители


19. Swiss Germanic (670 AD) ..... 20.19 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
34
% мач срещу всички потребители


20. Visigoth Germanic Girona (550 AD) ..... 20.38 (Кликнете за повече информация)
Нагоре
35
% съвпадат спрямо всички потребители


View attachment 11400

View attachment 11401
 
I get I6549 too :unsure: :grin:


Pb1pWkO.jpg
 
my cousin teresa from Val di Non Trento


1. Central Roman (670 AD) ..... 5.549 - CL36 (Click for more info)
Top 99% match vs all users

2. Central Roman (590 AD) ..... 6.369 - SZ43 (Click for more info)
Top 99% match vs all users

3. Central Roman (590 AD) ..... 7.084 - SZ36 (Click for more info)
Top 99% match vs all users

4. Gallo-Roman (590 AD) ..... 7.479 - SZ28 (Click for more info)
Top 99% match vs all users

5. North Roman Warrior (605 AD) ..... 8.056 - NS3c (Click for more info)
Top 99% match vs all users

6. Illyrian / Dalmatian (1200 BC) ..... 8.625 - I3313 (Click for more info)
Top 98% match vs all users

7. Scythian Moldova (270 BC) ..... 9.109 - scy192 (Click for more info)
Top 99% match vs all users




Roman + Illyrian (2.211)
Gallo-Roman + Roman (4.365)
Roman (5.549)
Gallo-Roman (7.479)
Illyrian (8.625)



I noticed via additional features , that the site uses the site, SNPedia , this site as well as the site Prometheuse will be owned by MyHeritage from the 1st of November 2019
 
Last edited:
I had conversation with MyTrueAncestry team on Facebook , he says that This Greco-Bactrian is closest to Ancient Macedonian , that is soldiers who followed Alexanders path to India , many samples are Macedonian like , some of them are mixed with Indians, he says that on pca Charts this sample is closest to modern day Macedonians , is something between Macedonians and Indians... Only Balkans(Except Croatians i think) score it and Ashkenazi.

asdasdasdasdasdas.jpg3123122222.jpg1231231231312.jpg
 
I had conversation with MyTrueAncestry team on Facebook , he says that This Greco-Bactrian is closest to Ancient Macedonian , that is soldiers who followed Alexanders path to India , many samples are Macedonian like , some of them are mixed with Indians, he says that on pca Charts this sample is closest to modern day Macedonians , is something between Macedonians and Indians... Only Balkans(Except Croatians i think) score it and Ashkenazi.

View attachment 11415View attachment 11416View attachment 11417

The site name is not: My True Half Ancestry.

If a sample scores India and Greece/Macedonia, imho MTA should be assigning that sample only to those that score Both Ancestries.

They should not assign it to those who have only 1 of the 2 ancestries.

(Many of us have done more than one test, and we already know who we are, and who we are not)
 

This thread has been viewed 1301823 times.

Back
Top