MOESAN
Elite member
- Messages
- 5,893
- Reaction score
- 1,296
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Brittany
- Ethnic group
- more celtic
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- R1b - L21/S145*
- mtDNA haplogroup
- H3c
When I look at this pagge 22-23:
https://www.science.org/action/down...6/science.abq0755&file=science.abq0755_sm.pdf
What is difference between light and blond hair?
And I'm convinced that with regard to blond we also must take in account red hair. Because in both cases it's about pheomelanin.
Hair without much eumelanin gives depigmented hair, a kind of ash blond, simply: brown hair but depigmented.
It's the reddish yellow pheomelanin that gives the warmth. Tacitus gave the name rufios to Germanic blond, does this implicate a reddish, warm pigment?
But in the table in the publication red hair is restricted to only three hits, Bronze Age Croatia, LBK Baden Hungary, Hungarian Bell Beaker, and a Hungarian Longobard (hinting at Tacitus ?
Nevertheless to fragmented to draw any conclusion I guess.....
It's enough to look at the categories created by Lazaridis team to see their work doesn't permit precise conclusions.
For eyes, it's even worst. 2 categories!!! Surely some active SNP's have been omitted. And how to provide sure and precise links between SNP's and phoenotypes when there is in fact no consensus in the hues classifications?!?
Fisher's scale for hair was very precise but very fragmented and the diverse "scientists" who simplified it by re-groupings didn't it in the same way one compared to another...