Vlach haplogroups & deep ancestry?

In the case of Romanians and Aromanians tranhumant shepherdry was doubled by the mobile military character, that sometimes had acted as genuine task force,keeping their autonomy and spirit, see BOTH INDEPENDENT WALLACHIAS on the map(Great/Thessaly Wallachia).



Unlike the other Orthodox states ,Wallachia didn' t had dinastic Early Byzantine input(13th-15th. C).



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Vlachia
 
That's why Mircea the Elder like any others kept all the countries at distance, in a way or another,because he was proud living in his "Teara Rumaneasca",The land of Vlachs(Rumanians),that certainly WASN'T HUNGARY,BYZANTIUM,BULGARIA OR SERBIA!!!!!!!!!!!



And a SCHIAU remains a SCHIAU!!!
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, as you can clearly see,my opinions do not have the purpose to be debatable;that's why I always bring heavy arguments.
I said from the start,I2a had spreaded from the Romanians/Vlachs through knez(cneaz) and possibly voivod or jude,the communities' leaders,who were also interfaces with the outerworld.
In reality, it has nothing to do with the Slavs,because it actually demonstrates the search for recognition and economic/military development of the Vlach groups,that responded to the needs of the Byzantine and South Slavic states.
 
Another prove,this time from the Byzantine side,they were seeking heavy connections with the Romanian-Vlachs groups,see the Wallachian/Moldavian title Io(or Ion,Ioan=John),possibly enforced with the Samuil Comitopuli' defeat.


This is the ultimate guarantee from Constantinople,because Ioannes directly connected the bearer with the God himself,that's why the Romanians-Vlachs had high ambitions and expectations in this relation.

Kekaumenos describes the Vlachs forming a T in the Byzantine Empire,W-E,between the Slavs(Serbians/Bulgarians) and N-S Hungarians("Dacians and Bessi"),with a big military importance in the area .

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Io_(voievodal_title_particle)
 
Last edited:
Two of the Asen brothers were called Ioan,Ionita(Kaloyan),the same name had Basarab I,it appeared in the Serbian chronicles.



That's why Kaloyan claimed the Byzantine crown,with no Greek left to rule Constantinople,it was his Vlach right,even if he acted in a more or less Bulgarian manner too.
Still,Kaloyan demonstrated a Greekness,it was a more assimilated Vlach into the Byzantines,proving that he was not Proto-Romanian,not even a Proto-Aromanian:


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kDJ2nc0mFH8
 
Interesting clip,it seems that Vlad Tepes sent a letter to Turks shortly after he was overthrown in 1462,he demanded to be reinstalled,upsetting the Hungarians.


Another information, the Hungarian king Maria Corvin used to recall Vlad from his house arrest when he met the Ottoman embassy.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QC75RXEPopc
 
Last edited:
If the Cumans had gone to the Pontic steppes,why Moldavia turned to Cumania in the 1207 map?


The Cumans were a minority in East Romania,according to Papal documents on their Catholic bishopric from Milcov, the law was made by Walati (The Wallachian),who were "of fake,Greek rite".


In these outer Carpathian areas ,the Vlachs had caught Andronikos Komnenos in his way to Halych,while the Rus chronicles mentions the Bolokhoveni and the Berladnicks who helped Ivan Rostislavich,the Vikings are even more sincere,Blakumen,Blokumen.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kDJ2nc0mFH8
 
Last edited:
By then,"Greek" meant not only Orthodox, but also Christian...


Blakumen,Blakumanland,it's the same story that Kekaumenos tells us,in the mid XI,the Vlachs(Dacians and Bessi) rebelled en masse against the Byzantines,some of them were defeated and resettled to the Southern Balkans.


The information from Snorri's.... saga is recorded as an anachronism ,with the source in the Viking chronicles/runes from 1050's.


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blakumen
 
Last edited:
Lack of betacism in the Latin elements of both the Dalmatian and Albanian points to a much bigger connection with Rome and Constantinople than Romanian.


Albanian vjeter,Dalmatian vetrun,Romanian biet,batran.


https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/vetrun#Dalmatian


https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/vjetër



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulgar_Latin



In the same time,Albanian had inherited kishe (cl-k,s-sh,in Latin loans),the term for "ecclesiastical "church that the Goths also had (aikklesio),while the Romanian word is biserica,from Latin basilica, initially a military building.


The only place were it can be found in the Balkans is Sirmium," In basilica domini nostri Erenei",if I recall correct.



https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/ecclesia



https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/ἐκκλησία
 
In the XI-XII c we see the Byzantines "reopening" the links with the Catholicism/West and both the Balkans and Russia supported both religions, at the time when Romanians fought for (real) Orthodoxy against a larger Hungary.


Byzantine Orthodoxy(Russia,Greece,Albania,Bulgaria,Serbia) remains a "Satanic" cult,always having links with the West (Catholic/Protestants),Judaism and Islam,the split and forgiveness being implied in simply financial operations.



The Albanian/Russian/Serbian/Greek /German is acting like the most of the humans from the West or Middle East:if you give him a buck,he will forget everything.
 
And one of the most important proofs is the Anatolian anomaly, the double headed eagle,that was also exported in the West.
 
Rheto-Romance is the other language that uses basilica as the main term for the church.


Another development that took place on the Latin from the Danube border is the semantic shift of afflare,moving from "to breathe" towards "to find",present in Portuguese, Spanish,Romanian and Rheto-Romance,indicating a military, scouting, situation.


It also entered the Danube Christianity,like the Rheto-Romance expression "anflar Dio", " to find God".



https://gloria.tv/video/QvgKQrkF8XVR3iNqVmPEh97WR




https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/afflo#Latin
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

This thread has been viewed 485427 times.

Back
Top