Hawk
Regular Member
- Messages
- 2,290
- Reaction score
- 1,125
- Points
- 113
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- E-V13
But the surname Berisha is carried by different people/families/clans. No where did Kelmendasi play devils advocate by stating something like "real Berisha are this line or that". He stated a simple fact. There are unrelated Berisha. Now if he said the Berisha of Puka should be the same as those from Diber, you may have a point. There is no where in any history book that everyone who is a Berisha has to be from Puka or has to be E-V13. We can only say for certain those Berisha of Puka or those claiming to come from them MUST be E-V13 as this is the biggest Berisha fis/clan there is with that name. Most famous for sure.
As far as the Berisha fis of Diber mentioned with Skanderbeg, they are a tribe their own. And whilst many have theoretically tried to connect them to those of Puka, there is no actual evidence of that and now Y-DNA testing also confirms that they are not in fact related. Claiming those who have the surname Berisha that aren't from Puka is "equivalent to gypsies/roma" having that surname is extremely childish and insulting. Just because the Berisha of Puka are the largest and most popular with that surname, does not make other smaller fis with this surname Gypsies or insignificant.
I'm not sure what the etymology of Berisha is, but one would expect like "Gjergj" or "Gjon" that many can bare this name without any relation to the other.
It just so happens that those of Puka are the ones who are the most famous for it. And perhaps the Berisha mentioned in Latin records which would make sense.
I still don't see how he is being slimey or mischievous for stating simple facts.
It's not a fact at all. And he didn't state it, he just copied and pasted whatever Rrenjet admin has wroten.
There are absolutely no other known Berishas outside the core Berisha region from Puke, it is true that some Roma/Gypsies adopted this surname and i am pretty sure this surname was adopted by the Berisha of Diber (more precisely couple of houses in the village of Muhurr) way earlier as well and there is nothing insulting about it, it is what it is (i am stating there are other unrelated people who adopted this surname, i am not equating). Since they are quite small, numbering in fingers, just as those from Librazhd are (in fact there is no material available for them, likely they don't even exist), there are no other known cases of unrelated people carrying this surname, everyone stating otherwise is obviously trying to create false perception or frame projection.
This is not a frequent surname or tribe name appearing all over Albanians, it's the original Berisha carrying this, couple of houses in Muhurr and so far some ghost Berishas from Librazhd. Logic dictates that if those from Muhurr are not E-V13 FGC33625 then they adopted that surname along the way even if they were E-V13 some other subclade or any other Y-DNA.