sparkey
Great Adventurer
- Messages
- 2,250
- Reaction score
- 352
- Points
- 0
- Location
- California
- Ethnic group
- 3/4 Colonial American, 1/8 Cornish, 1/8 Welsh
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- I2c1 PF3892+ (Swiss)
- mtDNA haplogroup
- U4a (Cornish)
Did I say that? Where did I say that? More baseless assumptions and accusations. This is getting kind of old.
Seriously? You said:
Everyone in this post is wrong. Read Maciamo's autosomal admixtures. Where in the world is R1 classified as Asian?
...
N1 is almost exclusively East Asian in ethnic origin; not European.
I am accurately representing your position, no assumptions needed, and no accusations made. Could you please engage my criticism instead of playing victim every time I try to talk to you?
Try (1) arguing that R1b is not in fact younger than N1c in Europe, (2) making a case for why it is more European than N1c despite being younger, or (3) backtracking on your suggestion that R1 is not to be classified as Asian, while N1 is. Any of those could advance the conversation.
And by the way, is R1b prevalent in East Asian populations such as Chinese, Korean or Japanese? I would say it's likely; but the odds of this would be pretty damn low.
What does it matter? The most ancient surviving haplogroup in Europe, C-V20, has its closest living relative in Japan. But that doesn't make C-V20 Mongoloid. The temporal aspect matters.