Piro Ilir
Regular Member
- Messages
- 1,155
- Reaction score
- 92
- Points
- 0
Aldo your theory by a linguistic point of view could seem very reasonable, it isn't by a logical and historical about albanian habits.
First of all if we albanians were epirotes we would only have R1B+J2B while E wouldn't be so typical.
Then we wouldn't be typically shepherds but would me more farmers and would have our lowland terms instead of importing them, then we would ve coastal people too so why don't we have authoctonous indigenous terms about sea?
Then we albanians as I said by an historical point of view would simply be all latinized + woulde compromized by a strong influence of greek, but in albanian is quazi absent.
Then if we were there before why we don't have typical toponysms or at least we have some really limited in numbers just for rural villages? If we were there how is it possible that slavic tribes nowadays extinguished had their own villages such as poloska, pogradec, zharnec, divjake, voskopoje, vetipoje, korçe, etc. into albanian territory?
In my opinion there are quite a lot of unexplainable things, that could be explained just by an origin far far norther.
You were telling me about labial or laringeal sounds I don't remember well and that how in romanian this occure while in albanian not.
Then the quazi complete lack of albanian typical name, no seriously, except from the stolen illyrian names from the tombs founded during the communist regime we only have religious names or instead latin or greeks, but not albanians, same thing for romanians, we have just ( i come from the south so i am gonna tell you the christian ones i know) Kozma, jorgji, anastas, artur, eduart, petro, nikolla, mateo, dhimitër, kristaiq, kristjan, kosta, aleksander, etc.
Romanians are in a similar situation.
So this is a common feature of both albanians and romanians, at least in archaic times albanians and romanians got deep into christianization at the point that used only religious names and not anymore the original ones.
Still there is a linguologist that aldo is anti-serbian did an article called: slavic language?A baltized albanian.
He showes how we share grammatical features with balts but even more with slavs i will post the article soon.
There to many things unexplainable with albanians being epirotes and to many proofs that push the attention elsewhere, like albanian tombs? Albanian ancient alphabet?
And still if epirotes would survice they would speak a semi or totally hellenized language, they were really filo greeks, they wanted at any cost to become greeks, they had greek habits and uses, they prayed greek gods in greek temples, i wouldn't think after all that of epirric would remain something after hellenization + latinization.
While albania with no greek influence + being quazi totally latinized couldn't develop in nowadays albania.
What about this? What if albanians were sarmatians, Just sugestions, romans got till crimea maybe in the border with dacia there were even some sarmatians reconductible to albanians, i think we should study even them, but one thing is clear, albanian was satem, that's the point in my opinion.
The prefecture of Illyricum during the pick of Illyrian's rule over the Roman empire. (Read about the Illyrian's soldery)