InnerVision said:
the harmful effects of being an atheist (Most of them Believe in Darwinism & thus on Racism __wanna hear about you ...?? )
Thinking that racism exists does not make you a racist.
(2) ..Well Remember that Officer ..Huh ...??...Don't you want to Remove that Mentality ....i.e. That would be a Step towards Peace. ain't it ...??
Let me guess, remove that mentality by killing him? I smell your peacefulness.
As all of our Modern Science(Logic) is Proving the Faith on an Omnipotent Power. Educate yourself with the Modern Science first ...!!!Actually we do not have any other option so we have to Believe ..ain't it Logical ..??
All of our modern science? Are you sure, that
you are educated?
I'm not really sure of myself, but I think, reading 3 science newsletters (New Scientist, American Scientist, Explorator) per week is a pretty good start.
(2) ..If you still believe in Darwinism ; I WOULD SAY you are dumb . i'm sorry to say this though ....
I don't believe. I simply don't have the capability to believe. I suppose, the religious centre in my frontal lobe does not work properly. (But I do
not believe that you actually are sorry.) I can estimate probabilities, though. The probabilities carried by evolution theory seem much greater than any creationist stuff.
Prof. Leslie Orgel, an evolutionist of repute from the University of San Diego, California, confesses this fact in the September 1994 issue of the Scientific American magazine:
It is extremely improbable that proteins and nucleic acids, both of which are structurally complex, arose spontaneously in the same place at the same time. Yet it also seems impossible to have one without the other. And so, at first glance, one might have to conclude that life could never, in fact, have originated by chemical means.
No doubt, if it is impossible for life to have originated from natural causes, then it has to be accepted that life was "created" in a supernatural way. This fact explicitly invalidates the theory of evolution, whose main purpose is to deny creation.
Educated, hmmm? "Extremely improbable" & "seems impossible" become "is impossible"?
Funny, this. I discussed this topic usually with some Christian fundamentalists from the US. You're the 1st Muslim, yet you use the same crappy reasoning these Christian creationists do.
1st you take texts out of context, 2nd you read stuff into it which is not there. Crap! Misleading, if not outright lying (which should be forbidden by your morals, or not?).
If you would have read the original text by
Leslie Orgel you would have seen his conclusion, which reads:
"Whether RNA arose spontaneously or replaced some earlier genetic system, its development was probably the watershed event in the development of life. It very likely led to the synthesis of proteins, the formation of DNA and the emergence of a cell that became life's last common ancestor. The precise events giving rise to the RNA world remain unclear. As we have seen, investigators have proposed many hypotheses, but evidence in favor of each of them is fragmentary at best. The full details of how the RNA world, and life, emerged may not be revealed in the near future. Nevertheless, as chemists, biochemists and molecular biologists cooperate on ever more ingenious experiments, they are sure to fill in many missing parts of the puzzle."
A supernatural way? Natural causes impossible? Crap!
The probability of any such proteins to form by chance is 1 in 10raise to power 300. And in mathematics, any probability smaller than 10raised to power 50 is considered an impossibility.
Of course, it is almost impossible for a complete protein to form out of thin air. Oh, my! Has nobody ever told you that proteins are already evolved? They didn't spring suddenly into existence but there very probably were earlier less complex forms.
Regardless of how much time we granted for amino acids to form proteins, they never could form by chance. The American geologist William Stokes concedes this reality in his book, Essentials of Earth History
A geologist? Probably
the authority on evolution. Since I don't have so much time, I won't check this one whether you again try to mislead us. But, anyway, a geologist?
This statement reveals clearly that evolutionist scientists consider the scientifically proven belief in ?zero probability? as a scientific approach.
Logic? "Look into" does not equal "believe in".
In reality, principles of both logic and science demand that if a particular event has two possible explanations, where one has zero chance of being correct, then, the other explanation must be true.
Our expert in logic at work again? If something is highly improbable, it's still not impossible.
(3) ...If you are really sincere for attaining Peace .... you have to Remove the Evil Mentality. ain't it ..??
By killing all people I suspect of that
evil mentality? Peace on Earth, then. I suspect all human beings.
(4) ...Well just for the Honest Information ..check this ...
Islam Has Brought Peace and Harmony to the Middle East All Through History
Its just one example.
Before that "peace", didn't they have quite some wars?
(5) ..Only & only those nations were Destroyed by Allah (The All_Mighty) which were not on the Right Track .Moving away from the actual Purpose of their Lives , which i have mentioned earlier. Whats the Problem in that ...??
The Creator wanted them to do Good to this Universe .They were astrayed & therefore Eradicated for the betterment of society.
Whole nations? Including new born (or even un-born) babies? Your Allah appears as just the same mass-murderous god as that one from the Bible.
I decide my purpose in life myself. I don't see why I should follow some ancient book. If some people choose to believe in supernatural beings, then be it. I won't hinder them. But if they want to eradicate me for not following their book of choice, they won't find peace with me. I do unto others as they do unto me (but individually, not collectively).
BTW, if a protein is impossible to come into being out of the blue, how probable is it, that such a complex being like Allah just pops into existence?