Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Is no one aware that we have no uniparental much less autosomal ancient dna from Illyrians ? Or is the argument too much fun to let science interfere with it?
And how can any of you possibly know the dna profile of Alexander?
I am not afraid, I know the language spoken by ancestors, it is written in Hescychius lexicon,
no matter Christians and Clemes wanted to input christian words as Greek, the part of Makedonian is not changed,
besides, from what is found today in Slavic Makedonia, we might speak that Illyrians left written,
we will see soon,
Why is this Englishman saying the same thing I am saying:Alexander was not Greek
The fact that Philip and Alexander used the Greek language for administration and were supposedly "Hellenistic" in orientation has more to do with political manipulation and administrative convenience than any appreciation for the Greeks. This observation is not disputed by historians. Thus the use of the Greek language does not tell us anything about the ethnic or cultural origins of the Macedonians. The English language has had a similar role in recent international history. The third largest English-speaking country in the world today (at least in population terms) is the Philippines, according to that country's own claims. Yet no one would seriously suggest that the people of the Philippines are English, or even American, by race or by culture.
The evidence discussed in this book indicates that Alexander's mother tongue was not Greek, his mother was probably not Greek and his father was not Greek. Eventually Alexander himself became an "internationalist" rather than a Hellenophile, even to the extent of arranging marriages between thousands of Persian women and his own troops in a strange effort to merge the peoples and cultural extremes of his empir
yes, but he was not illyrian either . He and his father fought many years against the illyrian invasion from the north. An invasion to stop the illyrians from taking macedonian lands along the coast after the annexation of the epirotes in modern albania
yes, but he was not illyrian either . He and his father fought many years against the illyrian invasion from the north. An invasion to stop the illyrians from taking macedonian lands along the coast after the annexation of the epirotes in modern albania
yes, but he was not illyrian either . He and his father fought many years against the illyrian invasion from the north. An invasion to stop the illyrians from taking macedonian lands along the coast after the annexation of the epirotes in modern albania
Read my above posts where German and English members of respective academy of sciences are saying,
My educated guess is that there was a relation between Thracian and Illyrian populations with Macedonians of antiquity. As far as I have read that relation was not too distant,
Since both Thracians and Illyrians cluster predominantly E v13 there is greater chance of Alexander being E v13. But again just an educated guess, nothing scientific. Its a good chance of him being preGermanic I since Macedonians since the present day population of that region today ha a higher percentage of that haplogroup,
They spoke a language which was understood by Illyrians and Thracians. So a language of the same family.
The last recorded time of Macedonian language spoken in Macedonia is 4th century AD.
Many scholars have concluded that the ancient Macedonian language was not a Greek dialect and that it was more or less related to the languages of Macedonia's northern neighbors, the Illyrians and the Thracians. These scholars include Muller and Mayer, writing in the nineteenth century, and Thumb, Thumb-Kieckers, Vasmer, Kacarov, Beshevljev, Budimir, Pisani, Russu, Baric, Poghirc, Chantraine, Katicic, and Nerosnak, writing in the twentieth. Here attention will be given to sources more readily accessible to those who want to inquire further.Any evidence of that claim? It is very simple. You and many other Albanians don't need to go out of your way on forums like these and write all of your claims. Scientific evidence is a blow in the face. You really don't need to convince anyone if the evidence is there. So please, show us evidence of a Macedonian languange not akin to Greek. It would be very helpful to us.
Any evidence of that claim? It is very simple. You and many other Albanians don't need to go out of your way on forums like these and write all of your claims. Scientific evidence is a blow in the face. You really don't need to convince anyone if the evidence is there. So please, show us evidence of a Macedonian languange not akin to Greek. It would be very helpful to us.
well works to stabilize the statics of tomp continue.
2 more interesting photos
until now they are at 3rth chamber, they see the gate, but possibly is a 4rth chamber.
this is what we call Greek foot, again we find it for another time, thousands to myriads times to who knows how many?
the soes are the typical κοθορνος/κοθορνοι cothurnus, in red and yellow,
the height is more than 2 meters, they stand on an βαθρο, a column
Now a new scenario is on loose.
the karyatid existance seems to pass the excavations to another lvl,
according to new hypothetical theories, the Caryatids show the Artemis (diana) style, since their difference is obvious,
that follows the Makedonian religion upon which Artemis was the protecting godess, who fly over the battle,
in that case we might have something unexpected here,
a temple of Artemis, closed by Christians,
yet all are still theories,
This findings are amazing. A culmination of the greatness of the Greek culture. But the property of a not Greek population.
thank you,
by hearing that from you, I am certain now,
kisses, I love you too
From the mouth of probably Greek himselfThis findings are amazing. A culmination of the greatness of the Greek culture. But the property of a not Greek population.
This thread has been viewed 65487 times.