The depictions and descriptions of Dante indicate a dark, very non-Langobard-looking individual.
QUOTE=Vallicanus;457069]The depictions and descriptions of Dante indicate a dark, very non-Langobard-looking individual.[/QUOTE]
Why does everything boil down to pigmentation with you? First of all, Dante is well within the European range as portraits of him which have been restored show. This is a reconstruction from his skull. It matches quite well some of the portraits. Some depictions are very much more severe, so we can't know for sure, and we know the perils of reconstructions. However, as I said, within the range of European variation, although definitely
not Langobard looking.
Much more important, his little finger is worth more than all the Langobard nobles put together in the grand scheme of European civilization, in my opinion, and I say that as someone who, given the fact that every hill in my area is crowned with a "Lombard" castle, and whose family tree contains more than one surname of Langobard derivation, probably carries some of their dna.
I used to have a "go" bag in case our local nuclear power plant exploded...Dante, a copy of The Complete Works of Shakespeare, and Montale were part of my "survival" kit.
For both you and Bighibert, this is a thread on the Etruscans. The next post on the Langobards after this one will be removed to a thread on their presence in Italy. Goodness knows I don't use a heavy hand as a moderator, but my patience
is not infinite, especially with people who repeatedly try to bring their anthrofora war on Italians to this site, trying to place them as outliers in Europe, and the other side piping in to paint them as Norwegians. ENOUGH!
I am going to post on the appropriate thread my response to some of this discussion, because I am sometimes misquoted or misinterpreted.