• Don't want to see ads? Install an adblocker like uBlock Origin or use a Europe-based privacy-friendly browser like Vivaldi or Mullvad.

Early Medieval Slavic DNA (years 600-900 AD)

Cool!! Watch that and inform us, I have not enough time.
 
srdceleva said:
His results resemble mine and it's why we cluster together ( me as the Slovak American) I am most definitely a mixed Slav and I guess he is too, that's what it most likely seems like any ways. He's far too Baltic to be Celtic and saying he is Germanic.. I don't know, he looks like a slav mix, his Baltic is quite high.
Click to expand...

How does one add themselves to this map?
 
We have another Early Medieval Slavic sample:

Sunghir6 (1040-1220 AD) - GEDmatch kit T005824

This one is from the Grand Duchy of Vladimir.

His Y-DNA haplogroup was I2a1b2a1a1a1a3-A16681.

Eurogenes K36:

Population
Amerindian -
Arabian -
Armenian -
Basque 1.69
Central_African -
Central_Euro 8.12
East_African -
East_Asian -
East_Balkan 7.02
East_Central_Asian -
East_Central_Euro 23.49
East_Med -
Eastern_Euro 22.27
Fennoscandian 6.56
French 8.82
Iberian 0.91
Indo-Chinese -
Italian -
Malayan -
Near_Eastern -
North_African -
North_Atlantic 7.48
North_Caucasian 0.49
North_Sea 9.40
Northeast_African -
Oceanian -
Omotic -
Pygmy -
Siberian -
South_Asian -
South_Central_Asian -
South_Chinese -
Volga-Ural 0.86
West_African -
West_Caucasian -
West_Med 2.89

Eurogenes K13:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 Baltic 46.99
2 North_Atlantic 27.29
3 West_Med 12.79
4 East_Med 5.08
5 West_Asian 4.98
6 Siberian 1.22
7 Amerindian 1.17
8 Oceanian 0.46
9 Red_Sea 0.01
10 Northeast_African 0.01

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Ukrainian 3.62
2 Polish 4.33
3 Estonian_Polish 4.6
4 Russian_Smolensk 4.72
5 Southwest_Russian 4.9
6 Ukrainian_Lviv 5.39
7 Belorussian 5.9
8 Ukrainian_Belgorod 5.92
9 South_Polish 5.99
10 Kargopol_Russian 8.67
11 Lithuanian 8.82
12 Estonian 9.47
13 Croatian 10.93
14 Erzya 11.03
15 Finnish 12.01
16 East_Finnish 12.5
17 Southwest_Finnish 12.82
18 Moldavian 13.9
19 Hungarian 15.11
20 East_German 16.04

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 86.7% Lithuanian + 13.3% Sardinian @ 2.34
2 76.5% Ukrainian + 23.5% Lithuanian @ 2.53
3 93.6% Estonian_Polish + 6.4% Sardinian @ 2.58
4 60.3% Ukrainian + 39.7% Estonian_Polish @ 2.64
5 93.7% Russian_Smolensk + 6.3% Sardinian @ 2.89
6 63.6% Ukrainian + 36.4% Russian_Smolensk @ 2.94
7 71.1% Ukrainian + 28.9% Belorussian @ 2.97
8 55.9% Lithuanian + 44.1% Croatian @ 3
9 82.9% Ukrainian + 17.1% Estonian @ 3.11
10 75.7% Estonian_Polish + 24.3% Croatian @ 3.14
11 62.2% Lithuanian + 37.8% Moldavian @ 3.18
12 56.7% Estonian_Polish + 43.3% Ukrainian_Lviv @ 3.2
13 80.6% Estonian_Polish + 19.4% Moldavian @ 3.24
14 70.5% Ukrainian + 29.5% Southwest_Russian @ 3.29
15 81.3% Lithuanian + 18.7% North_Italian @ 3.32
16 65.9% Ukrainian_Lviv + 34.1% Lithuanian @ 3.32
17 91.8% Estonian_Polish + 8.2% North_Italian @ 3.33
18 75.7% Lithuanian + 24.3% Bulgarian @ 3.34
19 88.3% Ukrainian + 11.7% Erzya @ 3.34
20 67% Ukrainian + 33% Polish @ 3.36
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dov
  • Like
Reactions: Dov
Sungir6's K36 similarity map:

https://s6.postimg.org/5f9yexzjj/Sungir6_K36.png

Sungir6_K36.png


Fire Haired14 said:
How many SNPs does Sunghir have?
Click to expand...

I don't have this raw data file, but according to GEDmatch Diagnostic Utility - 828,818 SNPs.

So it is a high coverage, good quality sample.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dov
Wow, this is the closest ancient genome to mine I've ever seen. I'm guessing we are at least 95% similar genetically. This is pretty good quality genome this Sunghir6. Our biggest difference is in uniparental DNA, but the rest is of wow similarity.

[TABLE="width: 251"]
[TR]
[TD]LeBrok[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]T005824[/TD]
[TD]Sunghir6[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Mine[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Russia, 200 km NE from Moscow[/TD]
[TD]1040-1220 AD[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Run time[/TD]
[TD] 20.50[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Run time[/TD]
[TD]13.62[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]S-Indian[/TD]
[TD] 0.62[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]S-Indian[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Baloch[/TD]
[TD] 7.47[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Baloch[/TD]
[TD]7.45[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Caucasian[/TD]
[TD] 10.05[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Caucasian[/TD]
[TD]11.05[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]NE-Euro[/TD]
[TD] 57.28[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]NE-Euro[/TD]
[TD]56.68[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]SE-Asian[/TD]
[TD] 0.54[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]SE-Asian[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Siberian[/TD]
[TD] 1.22[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Siberian[/TD]
[TD]0.91[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]NE-Asian[/TD]
[TD] 0.35[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]NE-Asian[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Papuan[/TD]
[TD] - [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Papuan[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]American[/TD]
[TD] - [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]American[/TD]
[TD]0.09[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Beringian[/TD]
[TD] 0.07[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Beringian[/TD]
[TD]1.76[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Mediterranean[/TD]
[TD] 21.53[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Mediterranean[/TD]
[TD]21.55[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]SW-Asian[/TD]
[TD] 0.86[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]SW-Asian[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]San[/TD]
[TD] - [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]San[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]E-African[/TD]
[TD] - [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]E-African[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Pygmy[/TD]
[TD] - [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Pygmy[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]W-African[/TD]
[TD] - [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]W-African[/TD]
[TD]0.47[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
 
LeBrok said:
Wow, this is the closest ancient genome to mine I've ever seen. I'm guessing we are at least 95% similar genetically. This is pretty good quality genome this Sunghir6. Our biggest difference is in uniparental DNA, but the rest is of wow similarity.
[TABLE="width: 251"]
[TR]
[TD]LeBrok[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]T005824[/TD]
[TD]Sunghir6[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Mine[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Russia, 200 km NE from Moscow[/TD]
[TD]1040-1220 AD[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Run time[/TD]
[TD] 20.50[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Run time[/TD]
[TD]13.62[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]S-Indian[/TD]
[TD] 0.62[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]S-Indian[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Baloch[/TD]
[TD] 7.47[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Baloch[/TD]
[TD]7.45[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Caucasian[/TD]
[TD] 10.05[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Caucasian[/TD]
[TD]11.05[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]NE-Euro[/TD]
[TD] 57.28[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]NE-Euro[/TD]
[TD]56.68[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]SE-Asian[/TD]
[TD] 0.54[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]SE-Asian[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Siberian[/TD]
[TD] 1.22[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Siberian[/TD]
[TD]0.91[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]NE-Asian[/TD]
[TD] 0.35[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]NE-Asian[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Papuan[/TD]
[TD] - [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Papuan[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]American[/TD]
[TD] - [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]American[/TD]
[TD]0.09[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Beringian[/TD]
[TD] 0.07[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Beringian[/TD]
[TD]1.76[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Mediterranean[/TD]
[TD] 21.53[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Mediterranean[/TD]
[TD]21.55[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]SW-Asian[/TD]
[TD] 0.86[/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]SW-Asian[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]San[/TD]
[TD] - [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]San[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]E-African[/TD]
[TD] - [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]E-African[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Pygmy[/TD]
[TD] - [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]Pygmy[/TD]
[TD]- [/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]W-African[/TD]
[TD] - [/TD]
[TD] [/TD]
[TD]W-African[/TD]
[TD]0.47[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Click to expand...
LeBrok, are you a medieval Pole who stumbled into a time machine set course for the 21st century? ;)
Seriously, you fit Sunghir6 almost perfectly.
 
His MDLP K23b results place him closest to West Ukrainians, supporting the theory that slavs originated there. He's Y haplogroup I2a is also common there. A coincidence?

1European_Hunters_Gatherers49.742Caucasian29.573European_Early_Farmers12.564Ancestral_Altaic3.865Arctic1.306Amerindian1.05

Finished reading population data. 620 populations found.
23 components mode.

--------------------------------

Least-squares method.

Using 1 population approximation:
1 Ukrainian_West_ @ 4.266315
2 Kashub_ @ 4.837808
3 Slovak_ @ 5.131750
4 Sorb_ @ 5.636687
5 Ukrainian_Center_ @ 5.777774
6 Belarusian-East_ @ 6.334647
7 Belarusian_West_ @ 6.471552
8 Ukrainian_East_ @ 6.737667
9 Russian-West_ @ 6.972755
10 Russian_South_ @ 6.995791
11 Russian_North_ @ 7.049220
12 German_ @ 7.641067
13 Czech_ @ 7.650525
14 Russian_Meshtchyora_ @ 7.810094
15 Russian-North-West_ @ 8.031343
16 Ukrainian_ @ 8.295169
17 Don_cossack_ @ 8.441618
18 Russian-Upper-Volga_ @ 8.585110
19 Slovenian_ @ 9.493657
20 Hungarian_ @ 9.671993




Sent from my KIW-L21 using Tapatalk
 
For these who claim that modern Polish R1b was brought by the German Ostsiedlung after 1250-1300 AD, rather than being indigenous to Poland, here is a surprise. Sample from Early Medieval Gniezno (the first capital city of Poland), dated to 1000-1200 AD, has positive calls for R1b:

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/PRJNA354503

Gniezno (1000AD-1200AD):

Gnie1 http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/SAMN06046900
Gnie2 http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/SAMN06046901

Y-DNA calls for one of these Gniezno samples:

L150.1/PF6274.1/S351.1 = R1b1a2
PF6274.1/L150.1/S351.1 = R1b1a2
S351.1/L150.1/PF6274.1 = R1b1a2

So we have R1b in Poland long before any German settlements.

========================

Summary of Y-DNA from Early Medieval Polish samples (tested so far):

ME_7, Markowice (1000-1200 AD), I1a2a2a5-Y5384
GO_1, Gniezno (1000-1200 AD), R1b1a2-L150.1
NA_13, Niemcza, (900-1000 AD), I2a1b2-L621
NA_18, Niemcza, (900-1000 AD), J2a1a-L26

I'm surprised by lack of R1a. But these are only 4 samples, only the beginning:

https://www.ncn.gov.pl/finansowanie-nauki/przyklady-projektow/figlerowicz?language=en

mapa.jpg
 
Well, it still could be mostly germanic haplogroups from mixing with leftovers of germanic tribes during slavic expansion. But I don't care either way. ;)
 
Hi, on mytrueancesty.com i have this compliance with RISE568. Pleas do you know some calculator when include RISE568. Thank[FONT="Roboto",arial,sans-serif]
[FONT="Roboto",arial,sans-serif]
RISE 568
[/FONT]
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 3)
14 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 121.54 cM
Largest chain: 167 SNPs / 13.34 cM[/FONT]​


Closest AncientClosest ModernSimiliar SamplesHaplogroups (NEW!)PCA AncientPCA ModernResearch Link

Your ra​
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top