Early Medieval Slavic DNA (years 600-900 AD)

Cool!! Watch that and inform us, I have not enough time.
 
His results resemble mine and it's why we cluster together ( me as the Slovak American) I am most definitely a mixed Slav and I guess he is too, that's what it most likely seems like any ways. He's far too Baltic to be Celtic and saying he is Germanic.. I don't know, he looks like a slav mix, his Baltic is quite high.

How does one add themselves to this map?
 
We have another Early Medieval Slavic sample:

Sunghir6 (1040-1220 AD) - GEDmatch kit T005824

This one is from the Grand Duchy of Vladimir.

His Y-DNA haplogroup was I2a1b2a1a1a1a3-A16681.

Eurogenes K36:

Population
Amerindian -
Arabian -
Armenian -
Basque 1.69
Central_African -
Central_Euro 8.12
East_African -
East_Asian -
East_Balkan 7.02
East_Central_Asian -
East_Central_Euro 23.49
East_Med -
Eastern_Euro 22.27
Fennoscandian 6.56
French 8.82
Iberian 0.91
Indo-Chinese -
Italian -
Malayan -
Near_Eastern -
North_African -
North_Atlantic 7.48
North_Caucasian 0.49
North_Sea 9.40
Northeast_African -
Oceanian -
Omotic -
Pygmy -
Siberian -
South_Asian -
South_Central_Asian -
South_Chinese -
Volga-Ural 0.86
West_African -
West_Caucasian -
West_Med 2.89

Eurogenes K13:

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 Baltic 46.99
2 North_Atlantic 27.29
3 West_Med 12.79
4 East_Med 5.08
5 West_Asian 4.98
6 Siberian 1.22
7 Amerindian 1.17
8 Oceanian 0.46
9 Red_Sea 0.01
10 Northeast_African 0.01

Single Population Sharing:

# Population (source) Distance
1 Ukrainian 3.62
2 Polish 4.33
3 Estonian_Polish 4.6
4 Russian_Smolensk 4.72
5 Southwest_Russian 4.9
6 Ukrainian_Lviv 5.39
7 Belorussian 5.9
8 Ukrainian_Belgorod 5.92
9 South_Polish 5.99
10 Kargopol_Russian 8.67
11 Lithuanian 8.82
12 Estonian 9.47
13 Croatian 10.93
14 Erzya 11.03
15 Finnish 12.01
16 East_Finnish 12.5
17 Southwest_Finnish 12.82
18 Moldavian 13.9
19 Hungarian 15.11
20 East_German 16.04

Mixed Mode Population Sharing:

# Primary Population (source) Secondary Population (source) Distance
1 86.7% Lithuanian + 13.3% Sardinian @ 2.34
2 76.5% Ukrainian + 23.5% Lithuanian @ 2.53
3 93.6% Estonian_Polish + 6.4% Sardinian @ 2.58
4 60.3% Ukrainian + 39.7% Estonian_Polish @ 2.64
5 93.7% Russian_Smolensk + 6.3% Sardinian @ 2.89
6 63.6% Ukrainian + 36.4% Russian_Smolensk @ 2.94
7 71.1% Ukrainian + 28.9% Belorussian @ 2.97
8 55.9% Lithuanian + 44.1% Croatian @ 3
9 82.9% Ukrainian + 17.1% Estonian @ 3.11
10 75.7% Estonian_Polish + 24.3% Croatian @ 3.14
11 62.2% Lithuanian + 37.8% Moldavian @ 3.18
12 56.7% Estonian_Polish + 43.3% Ukrainian_Lviv @ 3.2
13 80.6% Estonian_Polish + 19.4% Moldavian @ 3.24
14 70.5% Ukrainian + 29.5% Southwest_Russian @ 3.29
15 81.3% Lithuanian + 18.7% North_Italian @ 3.32
16 65.9% Ukrainian_Lviv + 34.1% Lithuanian @ 3.32
17 91.8% Estonian_Polish + 8.2% North_Italian @ 3.33
18 75.7% Lithuanian + 24.3% Bulgarian @ 3.34
19 88.3% Ukrainian + 11.7% Erzya @ 3.34
20 67% Ukrainian + 33% Polish @ 3.36
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dov
  • Like
Reactions: Dov
Sungir6's K36 similarity map:

https://s6.postimg.org/5f9yexzjj/Sungir6_K36.png

Sungir6_K36.png


How many SNPs does Sunghir have?

I don't have this raw data file, but according to GEDmatch Diagnostic Utility - 828,818 SNPs.

So it is a high coverage, good quality sample.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dov
Wow, this is the closest ancient genome to mine I've ever seen. I'm guessing we are at least 95% similar genetically. This is pretty good quality genome this Sunghir6. Our biggest difference is in uniparental DNA, but the rest is of wow similarity.

LeBrok T005824Sunghir6
Mine Russia, 200 km NE from Moscow1040-1220 AD
Run time 20.50 Run time13.62
S-Indian 0.62 S-Indian-
Baloch 7.47 Baloch7.45
Caucasian 10.05 Caucasian11.05
NE-Euro 57.28 NE-Euro56.68
SE-Asian 0.54 SE-Asian-
Siberian 1.22 Siberian0.91
NE-Asian 0.35 NE-Asian-
Papuan - Papuan-
American - American0.09
Beringian 0.07 Beringian1.76
Mediterranean 21.53 Mediterranean21.55
SW-Asian 0.86 SW-Asian-
San - San-
E-African - E-African-
Pygmy - Pygmy-
W-African - W-African0.47
 
Wow, this is the closest ancient genome to mine I've ever seen. I'm guessing we are at least 95% similar genetically. This is pretty good quality genome this Sunghir6. Our biggest difference is in uniparental DNA, but the rest is of wow similarity.
LeBrok T005824Sunghir6
Mine Russia, 200 km NE from Moscow1040-1220 AD
Run time 20.50 Run time13.62
S-Indian 0.62 S-Indian-
Baloch 7.47 Baloch7.45
Caucasian 10.05 Caucasian11.05
NE-Euro 57.28 NE-Euro56.68
SE-Asian 0.54 SE-Asian-
Siberian 1.22 Siberian0.91
NE-Asian 0.35 NE-Asian-
Papuan - Papuan-
American - American0.09
Beringian 0.07 Beringian1.76
Mediterranean 21.53 Mediterranean21.55
SW-Asian 0.86 SW-Asian-
San - San-
E-African - E-African-
Pygmy - Pygmy-
W-African - W-African0.47
LeBrok, are you a medieval Pole who stumbled into a time machine set course for the 21st century? ;)
Seriously, you fit Sunghir6 almost perfectly.
 
His MDLP K23b results place him closest to West Ukrainians, supporting the theory that slavs originated there. He's Y haplogroup I2a is also common there. A coincidence?

1European_Hunters_Gatherers49.742Caucasian29.573European_Early_Farmers12.564Ancestral_Altaic3.865Arctic1.306Amerindian1.05

Finished reading population data. 620 populations found.
23 components mode.

--------------------------------

Least-squares method.

Using 1 population approximation:
1 Ukrainian_West_ @ 4.266315
2 Kashub_ @ 4.837808
3 Slovak_ @ 5.131750
4 Sorb_ @ 5.636687
5 Ukrainian_Center_ @ 5.777774
6 Belarusian-East_ @ 6.334647
7 Belarusian_West_ @ 6.471552
8 Ukrainian_East_ @ 6.737667
9 Russian-West_ @ 6.972755
10 Russian_South_ @ 6.995791
11 Russian_North_ @ 7.049220
12 German_ @ 7.641067
13 Czech_ @ 7.650525
14 Russian_Meshtchyora_ @ 7.810094
15 Russian-North-West_ @ 8.031343
16 Ukrainian_ @ 8.295169
17 Don_cossack_ @ 8.441618
18 Russian-Upper-Volga_ @ 8.585110
19 Slovenian_ @ 9.493657
20 Hungarian_ @ 9.671993




Sent from my KIW-L21 using Tapatalk
 
For these who claim that modern Polish R1b was brought by the German Ostsiedlung after 1250-1300 AD, rather than being indigenous to Poland, here is a surprise. Sample from Early Medieval Gniezno (the first capital city of Poland), dated to 1000-1200 AD, has positive calls for R1b:

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/PRJNA354503

Gniezno (1000AD-1200AD):

Gnie1 http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/SAMN06046900
Gnie2 http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/SAMN06046901

Y-DNA calls for one of these Gniezno samples:

L150.1/PF6274.1/S351.1 = R1b1a2
PF6274.1/L150.1/S351.1 = R1b1a2
S351.1/L150.1/PF6274.1 = R1b1a2

So we have R1b in Poland long before any German settlements.

========================

Summary of Y-DNA from Early Medieval Polish samples (tested so far):

ME_7, Markowice (1000-1200 AD), I1a2a2a5-Y5384
GO_1, Gniezno (1000-1200 AD), R1b1a2-L150.1
NA_13, Niemcza, (900-1000 AD), I2a1b2-L621
NA_18, Niemcza, (900-1000 AD), J2a1a-L26

I'm surprised by lack of R1a. But these are only 4 samples, only the beginning:

https://www.ncn.gov.pl/finansowanie-nauki/przyklady-projektow/figlerowicz?language=en

mapa.jpg
 
Well, it still could be mostly germanic haplogroups from mixing with leftovers of germanic tribes during slavic expansion. But I don't care either way. ;)
 
Hi, on mytrueancesty.com i have this compliance with RISE568. Pleas do you know some calculator when include RISE568. Thank[FONT="Roboto",arial,sans-serif]
[FONT="Roboto",arial,sans-serif]

RISE 568
[/FONT]
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 3)
14 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) / 121.54 cM
Largest chain: 167 SNPs / 13.34 cM
[/FONT]


Closest AncientClosest ModernSimiliar SamplesHaplogroups (NEW!)PCA AncientPCA ModernResearch Link


Your ra
 

This thread has been viewed 31127 times.

Back
Top