• Don't want to see ads? Install an adblocker like uBlock Origin or use a Europe-based privacy-friendly browser like Vivaldi or Mullvad.

New map of Slavic Y-DNA

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...ls_Historical_Atlas_-_Europe_13th_century.jpg

There ''Servia'' no mention of Albania Croatia or Bosnia of any sort...

Also Macedonians are Serbs Ok I will show you my family from Macedonia now users here tell me if they fit where in Balkans Macedonia Albania Serbia etc

https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.ne...=fe51b93c9c2123988dd41fd84bc2c97c&oe=5BE3339A

https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.ne...=3131239726c34d3b30d0e3e26bc1f5b2&oe=5BD4EEF8

https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.ne...=170ff67db2c77867ca1423186c6556cd&oe=5BDD25BC

Guy in the last photo is clearly Balkan Slavic he has straight blonde hair and blue eyes and is tall/slender like Illyrians
 
What on earth are you on about? Every country during the middle ages has the same name apart from Dalmatia and Illyria and a map during middle age Europe in Serbia was called Servia...Croatia Albania and Bosnia aren't even named does that now make sense.

Where Albania is it says Illyria where Croatia is it says Dalmatia and where Bosnia/Montnegro is it says Servia....So yes you call yourself a Croat to separate yourself from Serbs just like Albanians call themselves Albanians and Bosnians call themselves Bosnians etc etc

Dalmatian is Roman actually and Illyrians were Romance\Slav mixed

Thats not true.The "Servia" term is late middle ages term, there was no such thing before(17th century).That territory you citied, was called Rascia(Raška) not "Servia"..Albania isnt even named ? Are you joking ? Albania is mention in 11th century as Arbanon,Arber and Albania from west(Europe).
 
Y DNA of muslims from Sandžak (from "Bosniak DNA project") [video]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandžak[/video]
Sample 189
E-V13 (78) - 41,2%
R1b (32) - 16,9%
I2 (24) - 12,7%
J2b (19) - 10%
I1 (10) - 5,3%
J2a (10) - 5,3%
R1a (5) - 2,6%
G2a (5) - 2,6%
T (2) - 1,1%
C (2) - 1,1%
H (1) - 0,6%
J1 (1) - 0,6%

Sandžak muslims are predominantly of Albanian and Vlach origin.
 
You are very patetic dude, and very bad *****.

I dont lie i swear : ) I only go by scientific facts.

Your Vlachic ancestors expelled by Drobnjaci, excaped to Albania and joined to Berisha clan as Gypsies. Drobnjaci > Kriči, deal with it!

You dont want to get into ancestor, origin and bloodline fight with me boy. I might hurt your feelings.
Then i rather educate you.

1. My ancestor was probably Latin speaking Vlach thats true, and prior to that he was Roman from Levantine provinces, probably Lebanon and surroundings. We dont know when we were Albanised but we are Albanians as long as we remember.
2. My ancestors most likely dont have anything with Krici tribe as they are most likely Y22063 negative according to close relative SNP test. Look at this post - http://www.foleja.net/index.php?topic=14.msg5398#msg5398
3. Therefore as my ancestors didnt have anything with Krici tribe, but also as we know that we are old Kosovo family, and not from North Albanian expansion, also Kosovo was famous for Vlach populations.
4. We remember clans coming to our village (Zhegra) where we owned almost all the lands in and around it. Then we joined Berisha clan. We are known as first family in village and we can easily track it thru land distribution.
5. My family was no Gypsy whatsoever but true landowners and slave owners. We are living only from selling land for centuries now. Even after so many centuries and generations, i managed to get some land there worth very decent money.
6. I dont care for Serbicized Normands Drobnjaks, at the time of their fight Krici were Latin speakers and Drobnjaks were Slavic speakers. Their success was probably due to Slavic and Serbian help.


You are very big *****, because your idiotic claims don't have any sense. Krajina Serbs ussualy got 41-43% North_European at K12b (same as Croatians), on the other hand Vlachs (Aromanians) and Albanians got 24-25% North_European. Slovenians got about 47% and Czechs 51%, which means that Krajina Serbs (and all Serbs) are much closer to Slovenians/Czechs than to Vlachs/Albanians, deal with it!
Montenegrin and Torlakian Serbs ussualy got 35-36%North_European, and they are the most southern shifted Serbs.

Lol, why it hurts you so much, you are just a little Slav inside of a Vlach corpus. I get it you are Slav not Vlach. But you are obviously more Vlach then all your South Slavic neighbors.
Btw why are you posting other people results, where are yours?

Krajina Serbs genetically are 100000000X closer to Croatians than to Vlachs/Albanians.

Dude, why are you obsessed with Vlachs? You are not Romanian.

J2-M205 has nothing with Romania or Aromuns, its not even found there. They were Latin speaking Romans but nothing like Aromun shepherds.
Its clearly a Latin Vlach haplo from territories of Levant arrived into Balkan that assimilated in various Balkan nations, but mostly among Serbs. Its probably due to their Byzantine Orthodox religion and later also slavicization of their native areas so they must have identified with Serbs later.
 
Well, they are obviously linking it to Vojna Krajina established by Habsburgs. In 1991 they should have named it Vlach Republic of Krajina, it would have made more sense.
I undertand that there would be no big difference if they would consider themselves Croats today, but its got to be painful when other country assimilates population inside of your country. Just as Serbs did Croatian Krajina Vlachs.

Orthodox religion must have been key to their success as obviously everyone would call you Serb in Croatia if you would declare Orthodox.

Exactly. The "Serb" was the term used by the Serb Orthodox priests to name their believers. Some Serbian medieval lords are the saints of the church. It goes so far that some Orthodox monasteries in Croatia maintain "memory" to their "founders", Serbian kings who, in reality, never ruled in Croatia.
 
This is based on 13th century map not made up!
 
Albania isn't named on any map please look above it's called Illyria not Albania find one factual map based on middle age names and migration then do the same for Croatia and Bosnia
 
@ Dema

This are your Latin speaking Vlach sheper cousins

You dont understand, Vlachs were no necessary cousins. They could have been from various provinces of Roman or Eastern Roman Empire provinces, also Latinized natives.
 
Clearly you do not understand the term ''Servia'' and what that means ethnically.
 
You dont understand, Vlachs were no necessary cousins. They could have been from various provinces of Roman or Eastern Roman Empire provinces, also Latinized natives.

Albanians and Aromanian Vlachs are cousind, both have high J2b2, E-V13 and eastern R1b.

Genetically Aromanian Vlachs are much closer to Albanians, than to Romanians.
Romanians are semi-Slavic.
 
Albania isn't named on any map please look above it's called Illyria not Albania find one factual map based on middle age names and migration then do the same for Croatia and Bosnia

Probably you can't find Albania or even Croatia and Bosnia in these "kids draw" map, but in historical map you can.
 
Albanians and Aromanian Vlachs are cousind, both have high J2b2, E-V13 and eastern R1b.

Genetically Aromanian Vlachs are much closer to Albanians, than to Romanians.
Romanians are semi-Slavic.

they also have high percentage of I2b south Slavic. Vlahs have been present in the area since the Turkish occupation so they come from somewhere
 
That's a historical map it's how maps were set up then Google any map of any area of Europe they will look the same.

About as much sense as Romans and Albanians coming from Lebanon yes.
 
they also have high percentage of I2b south Slavic. Vlahs have been present in the area since the Turkish occupation so they come from somewhere
I2b represents all Slavs because this is when Megalithic males left the Near East and populated Europe it is not only in South Slavs but all Megalithic populations but it is the most high Serbia E3b is actually the most high in Albania/Montenegro
 
they also have high percentage of I2b south Slavic. Vlahs have been present in the area since the Turkish occupation so they come from somewhere

I2a and R1a among Albanians and Aromanians is Slavic influence.
Some Slavs are albanized and vlachized during the middle age. Also some south Slavs are albanized in the Ottoman period (Arnautaši) [video]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albanisation#Arnautaši_theory[/video]

Aromanians are closer to Romanians only linguistically, in every other aspect they are closer to Albanians than to Romanians.
In the Ottoman period south Slavs often called Aromanians - Arnauts, because they did not recognize the difference between them and Albanians.
 
Arnauts were from the Byzantine Albanians I think they're related to Tosks or whatever
 
Y DNA of muslims from Sandžak (from "Bosniak DNA project") [video]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandžak[/video]
Sample 189
E-V13 (78) - 41,2%
R1b (32) - 16,9%
I2 (24) - 12,7%
J2b (19) - 10%
I1 (10) - 5,3%
J2a (10) - 5,3%
R1a (5) - 2,6%
G2a (5) - 2,6%
T (2) - 1,1%
C (2) - 1,1%
H (1) - 0,6%
J1 (1) - 0,6%

Sandžak muslims are predominantly of Albanian and Vlach origin.


They are not "Muslims" as you call them but Albanians in denial. Its not "Bosnjak DNA project" rofl but Sanxhak DNA project (so modern South Serbia territory where Slavicized Albanians live).
Their genetics has nothing with Bosnian genetics, as their DNA project name implies. Just as they dont live in Bosnia neither have any connection with Bosnia whatsoever.
Also i believe they included some members from Serbian project or from Bosnia that are artificially bringing up the I2a haplogroup percentage.
Their H1 member is obvious Gypsy while they artificially increased percentages of I2a haplogroup just to connect with Bosnia, these guys are unreal and amazing.




Albanians and Aromanian Vlachs are cousind, both have high J2b2, E-V13 and eastern R1b.

Genetically Aromanian Vlachs are much closer to Albanians, than to Romanians.
Romanians are semi-Slavic.


Aromanian Vlachs are probably Latinized Natives (J2b2, Ev13 and R1b) and thats why there is similarity with Albanians.
Interesting how there is no or very little J-M205 among Romanians and Albanians, even tho its clearly Roman Vlach haplogroup.
It could be because it arrived later thru late Byzantine Empire and they separated themselves form proto Aromanians.
 
Back
Top