Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well,i am from Central Greece,but I derive my Y-DNA from my Sarakatsani ancestors.My Y-DNA is I-M423 (I2a1b)
Well,i cant trust Y-Dna more than autosomal DNA.My Y-DNA is I2a,which is probably of Slavic origin,but my Slavic ancestry doesn't exceed 30%.
Of course i am mixed,but i can't say that i am a SlavWhen you can’t trust don’t trust it. You have good reason not to.
Your forefathers might be Slavic, but you are Greek.
Of course i am mixed,but i can't say that i am a Slav
Yes of course there is nothing wrong with that.I am proud of my ancestry.And i obviously want to learn more, because all the Sarakatsani i know score I2.You're not but nothing wrong with being i2 or Slavic. Slavic history may be short but i2 history is very long
Not really.'''
Yes, I think mtdna and y-dna are much more important in telling someones ancestry than calculators made by armchair scientists .
Well,i cant trust Y-Dna more than autosomal DNA.My Y-DNA is I2a,which is probably of Slavic origin,but my Slavic ancestry doesn't exceed 30%.
Did you read the actual paper? Or any of the numerous Balkan papers? You don't give me the impression of having read them otherwise there wouldn't be such non evidential statements based on some obscure personal bias by your side. If I'm surprisingly mistaken with my assumption please be kind and tell us which archeological complex supposedly would have yielded a major Slavic patrilineage in the Paleo-Balkans?As a Greek, you are most-likely under I-Y3120 (but if you are interested, a deeper test would be needed to confirm that). This haplogroup arrived very long ago in Greece (and technically, the modalities of this haplogroup arrival in Greece are far from being settled yet. To me, it likely arrived before the main Slavic wave in the Balkans).
AuDNA, Y-DNA and MtDNA are all three key in deciphering the genetics of a population.
Behave and if possible learn to read !Did you read the actual paper? Or any of the numerous Balkan papers? You don't give me the impression of having read them otherwise there wouldn't be such non evidential statements based on some obscure personal bias by your side. If I'm surprisingly mistaken with my assumption please be kind and tell us which archeological complex supposedly would have yielded a major Slavic patrilineage in the Paleo-Balkans?
I-Y3120 is Slavic, it's completely absent in the prehistorical Balkan archaeogenetic record and arrived during the Slavic medieval migrations. Anyone who disputes that in near 2024 is a helpless case. The authors of this paper and other papers themselves note this.
I wasn't speaking to you kid.As for all this Y-DNA doesn't equal auDNA non sense. Well wow, sherlock, I am shocked:
Well,i am from Central Greece,but I derive my Y-DNA from my Sarakatsani ancestors.My Y-DNA is I-M423 (I2a1b)
Apparently, you are emotional on the topic.So please tell me Einstein, how on earth is is possible that all my lineages from all sides are native Balkan ? Even from my fathers mothers side they are J-L283 . We didn't mix or assimilate Slavs or Gypsies or any of that other trash that came along there . We might of absorbed such autosomal DNA from other Albanians or taken some brides from some sides but nah we didn't mix with that shit. And how on earth is such a thing not more important in tracking your ancestors than some calculators made by armchair scientists ? And how is it not consistent with the language and culture that people have and speak ?
Lazaridis is one of the Authors? He obviously approved his name being on the paper. But he has a hard time telling the methodology?
Apparently, you are emotional on the topic.
The only probe that says from where are your ancestors in general is autosomal DNA.
Albanian did mixed to some extend with Slavs ... handle it, your DNA proves it.
As I explained you, analysing autosomal DNA with PCA diagnostics ("calculators") is heavily biased.
The way to do it is segment by segment, and it will gives you a depth of ~400 years regarding your origins.
Now, for deeper origins of your population, you can look at results from population genomic papers.
As you failed to reply to my direct questions about the two cases I proposed :
1) A haplogroup in northern Europe
2) Sapiens vs Neanderthals haplogroups
I suspect that you have no response to propose.
Regarding the relevance of haplogroup for culture and language ... take L283 as an exemple ... back in 2500 BCE, it was a single tiny lonely man. Whatever is his history, we can't be sure.
Was he part of big enough population to carry his own culture with him ?
Was he nearly alone and did he get incorporated in another population with a new language for him.
What is a given is that L283 documented branches in aDNA are found :
-In Nuragic Sardinia == non-IE population
-In the Balkans for Z597 inside Cetina culture speaking an unknown language
-In the caucasus with a Kura-Araxe/Maykop profile speaking an unknown language.
Thus considering that all this cultural background are different, we know that L283 did "changed" of cultural background and language with time.
Is any of this population tracing the language and cultural of J-L283 around 4000 BCE, it is far from being a given.
Lazaridis commented about this map posted on twitter by a random account,it's not from the study itself.Lazaridis is one of the Authors? He obviously approved his name being on the paper. But he has a hard time telling the methodology?
I found it funny but kept quiet, that he put his name on a paper that goes completely against his magnum opus. But reading this tweet it becomes absurd.
This thread has been viewed 32908 times.