I’d nuance the treatment of Trentino. Historically, Trentino was part of the wider Tyrolean/Habsburg space (often called Italian Tyrol or Welschtirol) so its inclusion in a broader “Tyrol” is not baseless. But culturally it is not simply the same thing as German-speaking Tyrol or South Tyrol, and it can also be understood within the broader Triveneto / Tre Venezie framework, especially Venezia Tridentina.Europe historical and cultural regions
![]()
Analyzing this map requires a certain degree of caution so that you are not misled into thinking that everything that tends towards blue is absolutely good and everything that tends towards red is absolutely bad.View attachment 19581
Countries in blue (negative scores) have no political polarization at all, meaning that people supporting different political parties can interact in a completely friendly manner. Conversely, the redder a country is on the map, the more hostile people are towards people with different political beliefs.
To my mind, the treatment of Italy looks rather arbitrary. It is as though the author knew in advance what the map was supposed to look like, but had no real idea how to distinguish between different areas except by relying on a stereotypical south-to-north gradient. Southern parts of Lombardy louder than its northern parts? On what basis? Campania quieter than Basilicata? I find that very hard to believe. Etc. etc.