Genetic study A genetic history of the Balkans from Roman frontier to Slavic migrations

eupator said:
Autosomals count 600K to 1.2mil SNPs, haplos are the only actual proof of historical migrations and population distribution, 2000 year old profiles rofl.
Click to expand...
Haplos measure only a small (direct) part of people's ancestry.
You must be delusional or biased asf to even state that haplos are more accurate comparisons than the autosomal ones
 
Omino said:
Delusional
Click to expand...
Look at the ftdna project page, and take a screenshot.

Every so many months, there's a new wave of Greek posters coping about the same things ad nauseam.
 
Omino said:
Haplos measure only a small (direct) part of people's ancestry.
You must be delusional or biased asf to even state that haplos are more accurate comparisons than the autosomal ones
Click to expand...
Autosomals get washed out in 10 generations, what you get with qpadm is statistical inference, only y chr. is a concrete proof of what transpired and which lineages were successful.
 
eupator said:
Look at the ftdna project page, and take a screenshot.

Every so many months, there's a new wave of Greek posters coping about the same things ad nauseam.
Click to expand...
The guy who wrote that the haplo comparisons are more accurate than the autosomal ones shouldn't talk about ad nauseam.
Even my dog laughs with your nonsense
 
eupator said:
Autosomals count 600K to 1.2mil SNPs, haplos are the only actual proof of historical migrations and population distribution, 2000 year old profiles rofl.
Click to expand...
Yeah, no. Autosomals are where you're actually getting the most data from out of a human genome, including all of the markers associated with unique ethnic groups to track ancestry. Y Haplogroups by comparison are nothing but a microcosm that represent less than 1% of your genome which have their own biases causing them to shift without migratory events. To ignore autosomals is like admitting you are stuck in 2008 levels of understanding about the human genome.
 
Vitruvius said:
Yeah, no. Autosomals are where you're actually getting the most data from out of a human genome, including all of the markers associated with unique ethnic groups to track ancestry. Y Haplogroups by comparison are nothing but a microcosm that represent less than 1% of your genome which have their own biases causing them to shift without migratory events.
Click to expand...
Actual geneticists must be idiots to use autosomal tools like qpadm in their studies.
They should have asked this delusional moron
 
eupator said:
Autosomals get washed out in 10 generations, what you get with qpadm is statistical inference, only y chr. is a concrete proof of what transpired and which lineages were successful.
Click to expand...
Autosomals by no means "get washed out" in 10 generations. This is total nonsense.
 
eupator said:
Autosomals get washed out in 10 generations, what you get with qpadm is statistical inference, only y chr. is a concrete proof of what transpired and which lineages were successful.
Click to expand...
Haplos literally wrote off the 1/2 of your ancestry in one generation.
Stop embarrassing yourself goofy
 
Vitruvius said:
Yeah, no. Autosomals are where you're actually getting the most data from out of a human genome, including all of the markers associated with unique ethnic groups to track ancestry. Y Haplogroups by comparison are nothing but a microcosm that represent less than 1% of your genome which have their own biases causing them to shift without migratory events.
Click to expand...
The test you took and sequenced 600K SNPs, less than 0.1percent of your genome or the skeleton they excavated with the 300k SNPs or much less is more proof than your y chr., roflcopters, come back when you read about f-statistics and stop wasting my time, clowns.
 
Vitruvius said:
Autosomals by no means "get washed out" in 10 generations. This is total nonsense.
Click to expand...
Tell me how much DNA you carry from your 11th ancestor in numbers, clown?
 
eupator said:
The test you took and sequenced 600K SNPs, less than 0.1percent of your genome or the skeleton they excavated with the 300k SNPs or much less is more proof than your y chr., roflcopters, come back when you read about statistics and stop wasting my time, clowns.
Click to expand...
Haplos is an even smaller part of your genome and ignores the 1/2 of your ancestry.
You're delusional asf
 
eupator said:
The test you took and sequenced 600K SNPs, less than 0.1percent of your genome or the skeleton they excavated with the 300k SNPs or much less is more proof than your y chr., roflcopters, come back when you read about f-statistics and stop wasting my time, clowns.
Click to expand...
Okay, then send me the statistics and material which claim that Y haplogroup testing represents a greater proportion of ancestral background information than autosomal tests. I'd love to read all about it.
 
eupator said:
Tell me how much DNA you carry from your 11th ancestor in numbers, clown?
Click to expand...
Much more than I carry from the individual who mutated the haplogroup which I received. By multitudes.
 
Omino said:
Tell me how much of your mother's DNA your YDna haplo carries delusional clown
Click to expand...
Mtdna doesn't mutate every generationand a half so not used to track historical movements.

You, copers, better stop as you humiliate yourselves further as many like you have turned us into a running joke in the archaeogenetic space.
 
Vitruvius said:
Okay, then send me the statistics and material which claim that Y haplogroup testing represents a greater proportion of ancestral background information than autosomal tests. I'd love to read all about it.
Click to expand...
He'll definitely provide such info, propably from the same imaginary friends that found Slavic input deniers in the thread.
 
Vitruvius said:
Much more than I carry from the individual who mutated the haplogroup which I received. By multitudes.
Click to expand...
You carry exactly 0 percent autosomals from your 11th ancestor, can your brain comprehend why?
 
eupator said:
Mtdna doesn't mutate every generationand a half so not used to track historical movements.

You, copers, better stop as you humiliate yourselves further as many like you have turned us into a running joke in the archaeogenetic space.
Click to expand...
I wrote about YDNA haplo you answered about mtdna.You're incapable of answering even simple questions.
The second paragraph is the definition of nonsensical delerium.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top