Genetic study A genetic history of the Balkans from Roman frontier to Slavic migrations

Autosomals count 600K to 1.2mil SNPs, haplos are the only actual proof of historical migrations and population distribution, 2000 year old profiles rofl.
Haplos measure only a small (direct) part of people's ancestry.
You must be delusional or biased asf to even state that haplos are more accurate comparisons than the autosomal ones
 
Delusional
Look at the ftdna project page, and take a screenshot.

Every so many months, there's a new wave of Greek posters coping about the same things ad nauseam.
 
Haplos measure only a small (direct) part of people's ancestry.
You must be delusional or biased asf to even state that haplos are more accurate comparisons than the autosomal ones
Autosomals get washed out in 10 generations, what you get with qpadm is statistical inference, only y chr. is a concrete proof of what transpired and which lineages were successful.
 
Look at the ftdna project page, and take a screenshot.

Every so many months, there's a new wave of Greek posters coping about the same things ad nauseam.
The guy who wrote that the haplo comparisons are more accurate than the autosomal ones shouldn't talk about ad nauseam.
Even my dog laughs with your nonsense
 
Autosomals count 600K to 1.2mil SNPs, haplos are the only actual proof of historical migrations and population distribution, 2000 year old profiles rofl.
Yeah, no. Autosomals are where you're actually getting the most data from out of a human genome, including all of the markers associated with unique ethnic groups to track ancestry. Y Haplogroups by comparison are nothing but a microcosm that represent less than 1% of your genome which have their own biases causing them to shift without migratory events. To ignore autosomals is like admitting you are stuck in 2008 levels of understanding about the human genome.
 
Yeah, no. Autosomals are where you're actually getting the most data from out of a human genome, including all of the markers associated with unique ethnic groups to track ancestry. Y Haplogroups by comparison are nothing but a microcosm that represent less than 1% of your genome which have their own biases causing them to shift without migratory events.
Actual geneticists must be idiots to use autosomal tools like qpadm in their studies.
They should have asked this delusional moron
 
Autosomals get washed out in 10 generations, what you get with qpadm is statistical inference, only y chr. is a concrete proof of what transpired and which lineages were successful.
Autosomals by no means "get washed out" in 10 generations. This is total nonsense.
 
Autosomals get washed out in 10 generations, what you get with qpadm is statistical inference, only y chr. is a concrete proof of what transpired and which lineages were successful.
Haplos literally wrote off the 1/2 of your ancestry in one generation.
Stop embarrassing yourself goofy
 
Yeah, no. Autosomals are where you're actually getting the most data from out of a human genome, including all of the markers associated with unique ethnic groups to track ancestry. Y Haplogroups by comparison are nothing but a microcosm that represent less than 1% of your genome which have their own biases causing them to shift without migratory events.
The test you took and sequenced 600K SNPs, less than 0.1percent of your genome or the skeleton they excavated with the 300k SNPs or much less is more proof than your y chr., roflcopters, come back when you read about f-statistics and stop wasting my time, clowns.
 
Autosomals by no means "get washed out" in 10 generations. This is total nonsense.
The funkiest thing is that haplos ignore the 1/2 of your ancestry.
 
Autosomals by no means "get washed out" in 10 generations. This is total nonsense.
Tell me how much DNA you carry from your 11th ancestor in numbers, clown?
 
The test you took and sequenced 600K SNPs, less than 0.1percent of your genome or the skeleton they excavated with the 300k SNPs or much less is more proof than your y chr., roflcopters, come back when you read about statistics and stop wasting my time, clowns.
Haplos is an even smaller part of your genome and ignores the 1/2 of your ancestry.
You're delusional asf
 
The test you took and sequenced 600K SNPs, less than 0.1percent of your genome or the skeleton they excavated with the 300k SNPs or much less is more proof than your y chr., roflcopters, come back when you read about f-statistics and stop wasting my time, clowns.
Okay, then send me the statistics and material which claim that Y haplogroup testing represents a greater proportion of ancestral background information than autosomal tests. I'd love to read all about it.
 
Tell me how much of your mother's DNA your YDna haplo carries delusional clown
Mtdna doesn't mutate every generationand a half so not used to track historical movements.

You, copers, better stop as you humiliate yourselves further as many like you have turned us into a running joke in the archaeogenetic space.
 
Okay, then send me the statistics and material which claim that Y haplogroup testing represents a greater proportion of ancestral background information than autosomal tests. I'd love to read all about it.
He'll definitely provide such info, propably from the same imaginary friends that found Slavic input deniers in the thread.
 
Much more than I carry from the individual who mutated the haplogroup which I received. By multitudes.
You carry exactly 0 percent autosomals from your 11th ancestor, can your brain comprehend why?
 
Mtdna doesn't mutate every generationand a half so not used to track historical movements.

You, copers, better stop as you humiliate yourselves further as many like you have turned us into a running joke in the archaeogenetic space.
I wrote about YDNA haplo you answered about mtdna.You're incapable of answering even simple questions.
The second paragraph is the definition of nonsensical delerium.
 

This thread has been viewed 37284 times.

Back
Top