Your response is a masterclass in intellectual dishonesty, packed with baseless accusations, logical fallacies, and empty rhetoric. You’ve provided zero data, zero sources, and zero valid counterpoints, while resorting to conspiracy theories, personal attacks, and laughable deflections. This was nothing more than weak, emotional outburst with no factual basis.
Your claim that something "shady" is going on is nothing more than paranoia without proof. Where is your evidence? Where is your data? You throw around accusations with 100% certainty yet fail to provide even a single verifiable fact to back them up. That is not how intellectual discussions work; that is how irrational people operate when they have no real argument. The idea that Rrenjet is manipulating donation allocations is absurd. If you had even the slightest understanding of how the project operates, you would know that sponsorships determine where samples are collected, and donors receive a full breakdown of where their funds go. I personally have access to a full record of test kit distributions, so your vague accusations mean nothing. Hell, just open the damn project site and look at the picture of the map where it's visually apparent where each tested sample is from/collected lol.
Your obsession with the haplogroups of Rrenjet admins is completely irrelevant to the validity of the dataset. Science is not dictated by the personal genetics of the people managing a project; it is dictated by the methodology, sample size, and transparency of results. What matters is the data, and the data is crystal clear, E-V13 is the most frequent haplogroup among Albanians. If the admins were all E-V13, would that somehow make the numbers more valid? Would it then justify the same baseless logic, that there is a conspiracy against non-E-V13 individuals? No. Facts remain facts regardless of who presents them. Your argument is a desperate attempt to shift focus away from the dataset itself because you know you have no valid counterargument.
You also try to invoke "Original Albanian DNA" and claim that an E-V13 admin ran it, as if that somehow invalidates Rrenjet’s dataset and makes theirs the quintessential reference point. That is nothing but a red herring, a pathetic attempt to inject an irrelevant point into the discussion. No one is excluding anyone from testing based on haplogroup. The fact that Rrenjet has the most detailed regional dataset ever compiled for Albanians, covering all haplogroups, completely obliterates your argument. E-V13 is well-documented, and no one is hiding it—your entire theory falls apart on its face.
Then comes your next unsupported claim: that Kosovo should be 40-45% E-V13 and Albanians in Macedonia should be around 30-32%, according to some mysterious "Macedonian paper" that you refuse to cite. Where is this paper? Who conducted the study? What was the sample size? What were the regions tested? Where can we verify its findings? You conveniently refuse to provide even a single reference. That’s because you don’t actually have a study, or you know that whatever study you’re referring to has nowhere near the sample size, regionalization or transparency of Rrenjet. This is what intellectually dishonest people do—they make vague references to “studies” that no one can verify and expect people to take them at face value. Meanwhile, Rrenjet’s dataset is fully available, fully transparent, and has nearly 2,000 Albanian samples with detailed regional breakdowns. If you believe another dataset is more accurate, prove it. I have yet to see a study that has a massive sample size, or even detailed reporting of regions and villages.
Here are the actual numbers, which completely destroy your claim that Rrenjet is downplaying E-V13. Among 1,793 tested ethnic Albanians, E-V13 is 28.2%, making it the most frequent haplogroup overall. Among Gheg Albanians (1,198 samples), E-V13 is 30.5%, while among Tosk Albanians (563 samples), it is 23.3%. The regional breakdown shows that E-V13 is dominant in the vast majority of locations. In Kosovo (291 samples and growing), E-V13 is 33.7%, with city-level percentages of Gjakovë (33.3%), Pejë (39.3%), Prizren (16.1%), Ferizaj (41.7%), Gjilan (28%), Prishtinë (40.3%), and Mitrovicë (45.9%). That alone obliterates your conspiracy theory. If Rrenjet were "suppressing" E-V13, how do you explain Kosovo having such high percentages?
In Albania (1,293 samples), E-V13 is 27.6%, once again the most frequent haplogroup. The city-by-city breakdown further exposes your lies: Berat (29.8%), Dibër (21.8%), Durrës (38.1%), Elbasan (25.3%), Fier (15.1%), Gjirokastër (26.5%), Korçë (20.7%), Kukës (31.8%), Lezhë (38.5%), Shkodër (33.3%), Tiranë (34.8%), and Vlorë (20.6%). In Macedonia (136 samples), E-V13 is 19.1% (R1b dominates so far), with Polog at 27.3% E-V13, while Shkup and the southwestern regions remain underrepresented due to a lack of willing test participants. This is a sampling issue, not a bias issue. If you want more E-V13 samples from Macedonia, then fund the tests instead of making ridiculous conspiracy claims.
Then, you say "I am not going to prolong to explain myself further." Translation: "I have no evidence, no sources, and no valid argument, so I’m going to pretend I’m too important to explain myself." That is the ultimate cop-out. If your claims were actually backed by evidence, you would be able to engage with the data rather than run away from the discussion while pretending your points are self-evident. They’re not. You have provided nothing of value. Science is based on evidence, not gut feelings, biases, or conspiracies.
Your entire argument collapses under scrutiny. You have no data, no sources, and no meaningful counterpoints. Meanwhile, Rrenjet has the largest, most detailed dataset of Albanian Y-DNA ever compiled. Anyone can look it up. E-V13 remains the dominant haplogroup. No one is suppressing it. No one is hiding it. The reality is that it is simply not as exaggerated as you want it to be. The problem isn’t the data, the problem is that your ego can’t handle reality. Until you can produce an alternative study with more samples, better transparency, and superior regional precision, your claims remain nothing more than baseless whining, conspiracy theories, and empty rhetoric. Your entire premise is built on paranoia, not verifiable information.