eupator
destroyer of delusions
- Messages
- 507
- Reaction score
- 281
- Points
- 63
- Ethnic group
- Rhōmaiōs (Rumelia + Anatolia)
The cognitive dissonance of the 'mainland' Greeks posters, like dorian9, ITT has reached such levels as to claim an obvious Albanian Cham ethnographic piece, named after the same very region of said ethnic group (Chameria), a word with an etymological meaning in Albanian but not Greek, as somehow a proof of the Hellenic identity of the region.
More or less, the same thing they do with Anatolians, appropriating their folklore musical style that was born out of their life in the urban ghetto, as somehow originally 'klepht', trying to take credit since they have no evolved ethnography of their own. 'Mainland' Greeks have a gap, an ethnographic black hole between 19th-middle 20th century (when they start appropriating the Anatolians) where nothing folklore exists other than centrally planned translations and ridiculous neo-romantic archaic revivals (literature, etc); thus creating a sense of cultural and spiritual emptiness and leading them to the absurdity of claiming Zeybeks and Chams equally as something that it was always theirs.
Of course, it's no accident that Anatolian-themed musical styles have dominated the modern pop culture in the country, they are the original sounds of the region and despite their often bad quality they maintain a sense of continuity.
I leave it to the 'mainland' Greek musical experts to continue to entertain us with new claims about how Cham and Vlach and Bulgarian and Zeybek musical pieces are proof of their ancient Greek continuity.
More or less, the same thing they do with Anatolians, appropriating their folklore musical style that was born out of their life in the urban ghetto, as somehow originally 'klepht', trying to take credit since they have no evolved ethnography of their own. 'Mainland' Greeks have a gap, an ethnographic black hole between 19th-middle 20th century (when they start appropriating the Anatolians) where nothing folklore exists other than centrally planned translations and ridiculous neo-romantic archaic revivals (literature, etc); thus creating a sense of cultural and spiritual emptiness and leading them to the absurdity of claiming Zeybeks and Chams equally as something that it was always theirs.
Of course, it's no accident that Anatolian-themed musical styles have dominated the modern pop culture in the country, they are the original sounds of the region and despite their often bad quality they maintain a sense of continuity.
I leave it to the 'mainland' Greek musical experts to continue to entertain us with new claims about how Cham and Vlach and Bulgarian and Zeybek musical pieces are proof of their ancient Greek continuity.