MyTrueAncestry Mytrueancestry.com

??? … Otzi vs S, 1-to-1 @100 SNPs window size threshold, default cM (7) and Mismatch-Bunching Limit:
3.9 Generations (with 25 SNPs: 2.6 generations)

BvQ8TFV.jpg


rsIuyj7.jpg
 
??? … Otzi vs S, 1-to-1 @100 SNPs window size threshold, default cM (7) and Mismatch-Bunching Limit:
3.9 Generations (with 25 SNPs: 2.6 generations)

BvQ8TFV.jpg


rsIuyj7.jpg



mine
 
??? … Otzi vs S, 1-to-1 @100 SNPs window size threshold, default cM (7) and Mismatch-Bunching Limit:
3.9 Generations (with 25 SNPs: 2.6 generations)

BvQ8TFV.jpg


rsIuyj7.jpg

Its not reliable. MyTrueAncestry is not and a Gedmatch result with such a few SNPs isn't as well. I mean 100 SNP per cM, that just means the coverage of the Oetzi genome is bad, it doesn't prove your close relationship. I mean
[h=4]Relic French King Louis XVI 1793 AD[/h]sample is no 3rd cousin of mine, even though, according to MTA, he shares as much as some proven 3rd cousins with me.

[h=4]Danish Gaelic Viking Iceland 935 AD[/h]is 2nd cousin level with 194 cM. Its ridiculous.
 
Its not reliable. MyTrueAncestry is not and a Gedmatch result with such a few SNPs isn't as well. I mean 100 SNP per cM, that just means the coverage of the Oetzi genome is bad, it doesn't prove your close relationship. I mean
Relic French King Louis XVI 1793 AD

sample is no 3rd cousin of mine, even though, according to MTA, he shares as much as some proven 3rd cousins with me.

Danish Gaelic Viking Iceland 935 AD

is 2nd cousin level with 194 cM. Its ridiculous.

… OK, though … I didn’t change the default GedMatch cM (7 cM), … so it’s not ridiculous, it could be basic shared ancestry, most Italians get a piece of Otzi DNA ancestry.

... from my NagGeo results: Italy & Southern Europe: 91% - The Iceman, Otzi, is a descendant from the first farmers to have arrived in the Italian peninsula, which may have harbored remnant hunter - gatherer populations during the Pleistocene ...
'Genographic Project'
 
Over the past year, I have collected raw data files and Ancient Sample Breakdown results from many countries.




I aggregated these based on placement on the ASB wheel. I did not deal with the percentage value or the deep dive results, only with the summary of the matches with the population genetically significant, archaic samples and the statistical data sets visible from them. I can show it in an Excel spreadsheet.

The order of archaic populations is my own subjective opinion about the role of the present-day population in the archaic composition of each ancient culture - more precisely, the archaic population definitions of mytrueancestry. The W column shows the total number of samples I have today from that population.

That is, if we look at the English today, I have 25 of these ASBs. Of these, 18 were Celtic in first place on the ASB wheel and 5 were Celtic in second place. 1 in fourth place and 1 in fifth. Column V shows how many present-day samples had no hits from that particular ancient population on the ASB round.




This is how the tables should be interpreted. I think the lines are especially interesting. If any of you may show your own ASB, I will add to that particular population database today and thus increase representativeness. I only made an excel spreadsheet for those populations today that have at least 10 samples. It is currently available in English, Bulgarian, Danish, French, Hungarian, German, Norwegian, Italian and Spanish. I am curious about your opinions. View attachment 12765
 
the MTA ‘Neolithic Karsdorf Germany’ sample is actually Kars537

… his y Haplogroup is not “uncertain” … he’s a y T1a1…

… also the GedMatch Kars537 Karsdorf LBK (# LN4023841 and duplicate # JM7481206) imho are not him, maybe they uploaded the wrong sample.

https://www.yfull.com/tree/T-Y63197/

YvTSNL5.gif


DV7IKCw.gif


3rIVTsF.jpg
 
Kars537 ( 6958 ± 49 yBP )


House/Phase: O / 2
Y-DNA: T1a1a2-Y63197 (xBY154289)
mtDNA: J1c6a

Sr isotope: Native to Unstruttal ( Rang Group limit )
Diet (d13C%0 / d15N%0): -19.7 / 8.9 (highest Animal Protein)
Age at Death: 25–30
Death Position: Stretched Dorsal southeast
Other ID: Feature 537 / Museum no 2004:26340a / 14C id KIA-40357
Sample: Skull
Read Pairs: 122,568,310
Mean Coverage: 2.96X
Virus: Hepatitis B ( HBV )
Autosomal notes: High CHG
Files: FASTQ / FASTQ (galaxy) / BAM (FASTQ=>mapped-SAM=>sorted BAM)


he is this one
https://elifesciences.org/articles/36666


https://www.researchgate.net/public...ny_-_biological_ties_and_residential_mobility
 
Kars537 ( 6958 ± 49 yBP )


House/Phase: O / 2
Y-DNA: T1a1a2-Y63197 (xBY154289)
mtDNA: J1c6a

Sr isotope: Native to Unstruttal ( Rang Group limit )
Diet (d13C%0 / d15N%0): -19.7 / 8.9 (highest Animal Protein)
Age at Death: 25–30
Death Position: Stretched Dorsal southeast
Other ID: Feature 537 / Museum no 2004:26340a / 14C id KIA-40357
Sample: Skull
Read Pairs: 122,568,310
Mean Coverage: 2.96X
Virus: Hepatitis B ( HBV )
Autosomal notes: High CHG
Files: FASTQ / FASTQ (galaxy) / BAM (FASTQ=>mapped-SAM=>sorted BAM)


he is this one
https://elifesciences.org/articles/36666


https://www.researchgate.net/public...ny_-_biological_ties_and_residential_mobility

… got Kars537 data from here:

https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/SAMEA104588897

you know it’s him because one of the download URL has:
http:// sra. ebi. ac. … Kars_537_M.NA.NA …
 
some say the Karsdorf 3 x T samples are cousins with the 2 x T bulgarian samples........did you find this to be true ?

I don’t know, though it seems coincidentally improbable, … I’ll look in to it … eventually :)
 
some say the Karsdorf 3 x T samples are cousins with the 2 x T bulgarian samples........did you find this to be true ?

… same haplogroups for the 2 x T Bulgarians.
X-DNA 1-to-1 (Tot. 32.5 cM - Larg. 22.7 cM) + …
GedM... :

# XV5136280 - I0700 Malak Preslavets Balkans MP Neolithic Bulgaria - y T1a1a - mt T2e

# CS6792606 - I1108 Malak Preslavets Balkans MP Neolithic Bulgaria - y T1a1a - mt T2e


AwdwMvc.jpg


JKJ2E0A.jpg
 
Hello,

Just tried Mytrueancestry and got the results below:

ANCIENT
Hellenic Roman + Roman (5.652)
Ancient Greek + Hellenic Roman (6.693)
Hellenic Roman + Thracian (6.876)
Roman + Hittite (6.994)
Hellenic Roman + Hittite (7.404)
Hellenic Roman (9.079)
Roman (12.93)
Ancient Greek (13.62)
Hittite (14.91)
Thracian (15.84)

MODERN

1. South_Italian (3.346)
2. East_Sicilian (5.201)
3. Central_Greek (5.305)
4. Greek_Crete (6.273)
5. Italian_Jewish (7.485)
6. Greek_Islands (7.606)
7. Ashkenazi (8.316)
8. Italian_Abruzzo (8.665)

I'm just wondering if it's common to get also top match with ancient relatives? or they are just trying to get people to upgrade?


[h=4]Hellenic Roman Marcellino 400 AD[/h][h=6]You are the #8 top match to this sample![/h]
[h=4]Tuscan Medieval Villa Magna Italy 905 AD[/h]
[h=6]You are the #10 top match to this sample![/h]
Thanks!
 
... testing SZ40 results from fastq file ... OK

also notice the three consecutive Collato Sabino plague victims, maybe they're related.

SZ40_Dod_Globe13,0.00,0.75,2.52,0.00,16.27,0.00,39.31,0.00,0.00,22.68,18.47,0.00,0.00

nW6QRAw.jpg


48dhFzI.jpg
 
If MTA still persist with sample R1 ( a female ) having ydna of O2a2 from east Kazak lands ..............then what is the value of MTA ????
 
If MTA still persist with sample R1 ( a female ) having ydna of O2a2 from east Kazak lands ..............then what is the value of MTA ????

Lately I've been using it to compare downloaded / processed samples, … making sure they’re recognized as equivalents. (see post # 3655 above).
 
Hi how can you download that raw data of other samples?

:thinking:
 
Lately I've been using it to compare downloaded / processed samples, … making sure they’re recognized as equivalents. (see post # 3655 above).


I just noticed they stated the foggia sample is Ydna L
 
I just noticed they stated the foggia sample is Ydna L
I see VK538…

I decided that only the Foggia Vikings could have named America Vinland (Vino Land), obviously, they probably danced Pizzica with the Natives too :grin:

VK538 general Y haplogroup:

DPKO7CT.gif
 
After today MTA upgrade......the samnite and etruscans finally added

my new order for bronze-age only


1. Protovillanovia Martinsicuro
930 BC - Genetic Distance: 4.903 - R1
Top 99 % match vs all users



7. Illyrian / Dalmatian
1200 BC - Genetic Distance: 8.808 - I3313
Top 99 % match vs all users



17. Illyrian / Dalmatian
1200 BC - Genetic Distance: 11.08 - I3313B
Top 97 % match vs all users



18. Illyrian / Dalmatian
1200 BC - Genetic Distance: 11.11 - I3313C
Top 97 % match vs all users



25. Etruscan Tarquinii Italy
800 BC - Genetic Distance: 11.8 - TAQ011
Top 99 % match vs all users



29. Etruscan Tarquinii Italy
800 BC - Genetic Distance: 12.33 - TAQ009
Top 99 % match vs all users



36. Etruscan Tarquinii Italy
800 BC - Genetic Distance: 13.0 - TAQ003
Top 98 % match vs all users



49. Etruria Iron Age Italy
1000 BC - Genetic Distance: 14.12 - ETR003
Top 98 % match vs all users



56. Etruria Iron Age Italy
1000 BC - Genetic Distance: 14.46 - ETR007
Top 94 % match vs all users
 
… olfactory receptor gene,

… Androstenone (Pheromone produced by men)
- I’m Repulsed by it -

Guess that heterosexual women and gay men are Not repulsed by it.

tiOPRsn.jpg
 
Back
Top