These are apparently the K12b results for one of these samples. Does anyone know which of these is from the DIY and which is from gedmatch? Also, why are they so different?
"K12 Dodecad results:
32.98% Gedrosia
- Siberian
- Northwest_African
- Southeast_Asian
- Atlantic_Med
7.08% North_European
- South_Asian
0.01% East_African
- Southwest_Asian
- East_Asian
59.02% Caucasus
0.91% Sub_Saharan
Code:
Distance ID
17.8 Abhkasians_Y
19.4 Adygei
19.5 Chechens_Y
19.8 Georgians
19.9 North_Ossetians_Y
20.3 Lezgins
20.4 Balkars_Y
20.8 Armenians
21.1 Kumyks_Y
21.4 Armenians_15_Y
21.8 Kurds_Y
22.0 Iranian_D
22.7 Kurd_D
22.9 Armenian_D
24.9 Azerbaijan_Jews
25.1 Turks
25.4 Iranians
25.5 Georgia_Jews
25.8 Uzbekistan_Jews
25.9 Assyrian_D"
"Kit F322930
Admix Results (sorted):
# Population Percent
1 Caucasus 48.47
2 Gedrosia 18.61
3 Southwest_Asian 14.3
4 Atlantic_Med 10.98
5 North_European 5.14
6 South_Asian 1.75
7 Northwest_African 0.69
8 Southeast_Asian 0.06
Ed. It would also be interesting to see how this sample scores in the K7b calculator's "West Asian" component, especially in light of Dienekes' comment that:
"Years ago, I
detected the presence of a West_Asian genetic component (with dual modes in "Caucasus" and "Gedrosia") whose origins I placed in the "highlands of West Asia" and which I proposed spread into Europe post-5kya with Indo-European languages.
Earlier this year, the study by
Haak et al. showed that steppe invaders after 5kya brought into Europe a 50/50 mix of "Eastern European Hunter-Gatherer" (EHG) ancestry/An unknown population from the Near East/Caucasus. The "unknown population" was most similar to Caucasians/Near Easterners like Armenians but did not correspond to any ancient sample.
A new paper in
Nature Communications by Jones et al. finds this "missing link" in the flesh in Upper Paleolithic/Mesolithic hunter-gatherers from Georgia which they call "Caucasus Hunter-Gatherers" (CHG)."