M
MarkoZ
Guest
That's not what they base their interpretation on. In section 12 of the extended data their findings are treated at length.D-stats I posted. Read them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's not what they base their interpretation on. In section 12 of the extended data their findings are treated at length.D-stats I posted. Read them.
OK. What is it then? You have shares in Iran?
But you don'y explain, but CLAIM it is unreliable. You don't explain a thing, actually
That's not what they base their interpretation on. In section 12 of the extended data their findings are treated at length.
It's amateur work and not peer-reviewed. Period.
Marko, what I did was swap the Iraqi_Jew in the D-stat they actually present in that very section 12 for Natufians and Iranians in order to see how much of it remains if old samples - that weren't available back then - are used.
So are your responses.
The Satsurblia Cluster individuals from the Caucasus dating to
~13,000–10,000 years ago2
share more alleles with the Villabruna
Cluster individuals than they do with earlier Europeans, indicating that
they are related to the population that contributed new alleles to people
in the Villabruna Cluster, although they cannot be the direct source of
the gene flow. One reason for this is that the Satsurblia Cluster carries
large amounts of Basal Eurasian ancestry while Villabruna Cluster indi-
viduals do not2
(Supplementary Information section 12; Extended Data
Fig. 4). One possible explanation for the sudden drawing together of
the ancestry of Europe and the Near East at this time is long-distance
migrations from the Near East into Europe. However, a plausible alter-
native is population structure, whereby Upper Palaeolithic Europe har-
boured multiple groups that differed in their relationship to the Near
East, with the balance shifting among groups as a result of demographic
changes after the Glacial Maximum.
One scenario that could
explain these patterns is a population expansion from southeastern
European or west Asian refugia after the Glacial Maximum, drawing
together the genetic ancestry of Europe and the Near East.
Let's spell it out again.
Their findings:
And hence their interpretation:
I see you're avoiding Fu's thesis again, which is elevated affinity to the Kotias-Satsurbalia cluster starting with Villabruna. Since you don't address this issue at all and since there's always some degree of uncertainty with ancient DNA, I think it's time you provided some evidence to support your alternative hypothesis of Aurignacian differentation and subsequent backmigration.D-stats? Comment?
@Epoch,
What a pity; you're definitely a two or a three. The discussion is over.
Something I don't get is the vast majority of Sardinians wouldn't pass as white. But the vast majority of Basque could pass as British or German or whatever. Basque have a high frequency of rs16891982(90%+) which could mean that SNP is what makes the difference.
I see you're avoiding Fu's thesis again, which is elevated affinity to the Kotias-Satsurbalia cluster starting with Villabruna. Since you don't address this issue at all and since there's always some degree of uncertainty with ancient DNA, I think it's time you provided some evidence to support your alternative hypothesis of Aurignacian differentation and subsequent backmigration.
I think those statistics-d models are completely expected, but unless you offer some evidence I have to assume that your intent is malicious and won't get into another pointless and lengthy debate.
Some nuggets:
Globular Amphora is 75% farmer and 25% HG, like Iberian Neolithic...no steppe.
This thread has been viewed 185347 times.