Ghurier
Regular member
- Messages
- 174
- Reaction score
- 121
- Points
- 43
- Location
- Many
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- J-L283-->J-Z631
- mtDNA haplogroup
- U5b2b
Interestingly, two out of three of our J2-M12 Picene samples (PN91 and PN101), due to their phylogenetic position (Additional file 3: Fig. S10) in between the BA Nuragic and the B
After checking their phylogeny ... some older samples are clearly placed in weird positions, when having no resolution they assume that the samples are basal.
![Capture-d-e-cran-2024-03-20-a-17-54-02.png](https://i.postimg.cc/k4JYVnXq/Capture-d-e-cran-2024-03-20-a-17-54-02.png)
Considering they place ORC samples upstream of theirs ... the samples are at least Z585+
They also place them upstream of I18748, thus upstream of Y15058.
If tracing BA or IA stuff, they will likely be Z597+
The question is, are they placed upstream of Y15058 because of unsufficient resolution or because they are on another branch.
PN91 have only ~25% coverage only, and its around ~9% for PN101.
(Z585+, Z615-) would be "gold" located in Italy ... but most likely, on the Adriatic side of Italy, they are Z597+ sub-lineages.
PS: their placement of ORC007 didn't match YFULL version. I wonder on which SNP they base such placement ? Whereas YFULL placement is based on a good-quality middle-sequence read.
PPS : They place their samples at ORD014 level ... which is weird considering that to my knowledge ORD014 is not confirmed anything deeper than J-L283 ... the fine structure of their phylogeny is "weird".